Caller Satisfaction With After-Hours Telephone Advice: Nurse Advice Service Versus On-Call Pediatricians

Author:

Lee Thomas J.1,Guzy Judith1,Johnson David2,Woo Heide3,Baraff Larry J.13

Affiliation:

1. Emergency Medicine Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

2. McKesson Access Health Services, Broomfield, Colorado

3. Mattel Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, California

Abstract

Objective. To compare caller satisfaction with after-hours medical advice provided by a for-profit nurse advice service with advice provided by on-call pediatricians. Methods. The study setting was the general pediatrics faculty practice of an urban university medical center. Participants were parents or guardians of a population of ∼6000 children calling for after-hours medical advice over a 10-month period from January 18 to November 20, 2000. After-hours medical advice calls were randomized to either a nurse advice service or the on-call pediatrician. Caller satisfaction and subsequent health care utilization were measured by a telephone survey of callers and review of all health care visits within 3 days of the initial telephone advice call. Results. Five hundred sixty-six (48%) callers were enrolled in the on-call pediatrician group, and 616 (52%) were enrolled in the advice nurse group. Caller satisfaction was rated as very good or excellent significantly more often for the on-call pediatrician than for the nurse advice service as follows: telephone call overall (68.5% vs 55.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] of difference: 8.0%–19.0%), thoroughness and competence of the person they spoke with (74.0% vs 59.1%; 95% CI of difference: 9.6%–20.2%), courtesy and friendliness of the person they spoke with (77.4% vs 73.9%; 95% CI of difference: −1.4%-8.4%), length of time spent waiting (70.8% vs 60.1%; 95% CI of difference: 5.4%–16.2%), time spent talking with the on-call pediatrician or advice nurse (68.2% vs 52.4%; 95% CI of difference: 10.2%–21.3%), and the medical advice given (68.6% vs 53.9%; 95% CI of difference: 9.2%–20.1%). Compliance with the advice given was significantly higher for office care in the on-call pediatrician group (51.5% vs 29.6%; 95% CI of difference: 8.9%–34.2%). Repeat calls for advice were significantly more frequent for the nurse advice service, both within 4 hours (13.0% vs 4.8%; 95% CI of difference: 5.0%–11.4%), and within 72 hours (23.4% vs 13.3%; 95% CI of difference: 5.8%–14.5%). Conclusion. Callers were less satisfied with medical advice provided by a nurse advice service compared with the traditional on-call pediatrician. The lower satisfaction was associated with somewhat poorer compliance with recommended triage dispositions and more frequent repeat calls for medical advice.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference25 articles.

1. Franks P, Clancy CM, Nutting PA. Gatekeeping revisited—protecting patients from overtreatment. N Engl J Med.1992;327:424–429

2. Nauright LP, Moneyham L, Williamson J. Telephone triage and consultation: an emerging role for nurses. Nurs Outlook.1999;47:219–226

3. Sabin M. Telephone triage improves demand management effectiveness. Health Financial Manage.1998;52:49–51

4. Anders G. Telephone triage: how nurses take calls and control the care of patients from afar. Wall Street Journal. February 4, 1997

5. Access Health’s ER Access (SM) Program Demonstrates Utilization and Cost Reductions [news release]. Broomfield, CO: Ernst and Young LLP; January 13, 1998

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3