Pediatric Specialists' Beliefs About Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Premature Infants

Author:

Golski Catherine A.123,Rome Ellen S.14,Martin Richard J.25,Frank Scott H.236,Worley Sarah7,Sun Zhiyuan7,Hibbs Anna Maria25

Affiliation:

1. Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University

2. Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University

4. Department of General Pediatrics, Cleveland Clinic Children's Hospital

5. Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital

6. Department of Family Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine

7. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic; Cleveland, Ohio

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wide variation exists in the treatment of suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in premature infants; it is unknown to what degree diagnosis and treatment are affected by the treating physician's medical specialty or interpretation of the medical literature. METHODS: This study involved an online survey of board-certified neonatologists, pediatric pulmonologists, and pediatric gastroenterologists about their beliefs regarding the symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of GERD in premature infants in the NICU on the basis of both clinical impression and interpretation of the literature. RESULTS: A total of 1021 neonatologists, 232 pediatric pulmonologists, and 222 pediatric gastroenterologists participated in the study (47.5% response rate). There was disagreement among specialists in nearly all aspects of the survey. Pulmonologists were most likely to report that respiratory symptoms are caused by GERD (P < .001). Neonatologists were least likely to report that a therapeutic trial of pharmacologic agents would be useful for diagnosing GERD (P < .001) or that lansoprazole, ranitidine, or cimetidine are safe or effective (P < .001). No pharmacologic therapy had >50% of respondents supporting its effectiveness. There was moderate correlation between physician belief based on the medical literature and belief based on clinical impression (Spearman rank correlation: 0.47–0.75). For therapies supported by multiple meta-analyses in infants versus therapies with few infant trials, physicians rated the evidence for effectiveness similarly. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variation among pediatric specialists regarding beliefs about GERD in premature infants, as well as about the weight of evidence in the medical literature for this patient population. Physician beliefs do not seem to be driven by the degree of evidence in the neonatal literature. With no agreed-on standard of care in the setting of widespread use of antireflux medications, greater understanding is needed about the ways physicians form clinical impressions, access and process medical evidence, and apply it to patient care.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Control of Breathing;Avery's Diseases of the Newborn;2024

2. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What’s new right now?;World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2023-03-16

3. Gastroesophageal Reflux;Textbook of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition;2021-11-25

4. Randomized Clinical Trial of Metoclopramide as Prophylaxis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Preterm Infants;Pediatric Drugs;2021-10-25

5. Transition to a Safe Home Sleep Environment for the NICU Patient;Pediatrics;2021-07-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3