Changes in Access, Utilization, and Quality of Care After Enrollment Into a State Child Health Insurance Plan

Author:

Kempe Allison1,Beaty Brenda L.2,Crane Lori A.3,Stokstad Johan4,Barrow Jennifer4,Belman Shira1,Steiner John F.25

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, and the Children's Outcomes Research Program, Children's Hospital, Denver, Colorado

2. Colorado Health Outcomes Program

3. Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics

4. Health Advocates, Denver, Colorado

5. Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

Abstract

Background. There currently are few published data evaluating the effect of State Children's Health Insurance Programs on health care outcome measures in children. Colorado's Child Health Plan Plus (CHP+) is a non-Medicaid State Children's Health Insurance Program that began enrollment in April 1998. The objectives of this study were to compare reported (1) access to care, (2) utilization of health care, and (3) quality of care during the year before and the first year after enrollment into CHP+. Methods. We interviewed 480 randomly selected families by telephone 2 months after their first enrollment into CHP+ (September 1999 to January 2000) and, again, 1 year later. We used generalized linear models to examine the effect of enrollment on health care access, utilization, and quality while controlling for type of previous insurance, length of time uninsured before enrollment, race/ethnicity, and age. Results. Regarding access to care, the percentage of families who reported a usual site of preventive care did not change significantly, but families reported more often being able to see providers as soon as desired for routine care (incidence ratio [IR]: 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37–3.02]), for care when sick or injured (IR: 2.77; 95% CI: 1.85–4.16), for specialty care (IR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.16–3.32), and for all health care (IR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.81–3.07). Unmet medical needs decreased after versus before enrollment for prescription medications (IR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.26–0.55), mental health care (IR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.40–0.97), prescription glasses (IR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.29–0.65), and dental care (IR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.47–0.76). Regarding utilization, the proportion who saw a provider for routine care in the past year increased (IR: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.06–1.83), but reported visits for sick, specialty, and emergency department care and hospitalizations did not increase. Regarding quality of care, the proportion who rated their health care as “best” increased (RI: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.04–1.66) after versus before enrollment. Conclusions. Families who were newly enrolled into CHP+ perceived dramatic increases in access to all types of care and decreases in unmet medical needs, no increase in utilization of emergency department or hospitalization services, and improved overall quality of care in the year after enrollment into CHP+.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference29 articles.

1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Number of Children Ever Enrolled in SCHIP by Program Type. Available at: www.cms.hhs.gov/schip/enrollment/schip03.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2004

2. Kempe A, Renfrew BL, Barrow J, Cherry D, Jones JS, Steiner JF. Barriers to enrollment in a state child health insurance program. Ambul Pediatr. 2001;1:169–177

3. Lutzky AW, Hill I. Has the Jury Reached a Verdict? Early Experiences With Crowd out Under SCHIP. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2001 [Occasional Paper No. 47:1-26]

4. Trafton S, Shone LP, Zwanziger J, et al. Evolution of a children's health insurance program: lessons from New York State's Child Health Plus. Pediatrics. 2000;105:692–696

5. Ryan JM. SCHIP turns five: taking stock, moving ahead. NHPF Iss Brief. 2002;(781):1–12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3