Affiliation:
1. Departments of Pediatrics
2. Respiratory Therapy
3. Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School and Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The goal was to estimate the level of delivered continuous positive airway pressure by measuring oral cavity pressure with the mouth closed in infants of various weights and ages treated with heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula at flow rates of 1–5 L/minute. We hypothesized that clinically relevant levels of continuous positive airway pressure would not be achieved if a nasal leak is maintained.
METHODS. After performing bench measurements and demonstrating that oral cavity pressure closely approximated levels of traditionally applied nasal continuous positive airway pressure, we successfully measured oral cavity pressure during heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula treatment in 27 infants. Small (outer diameter: 0.2 cm) cannulae were used for all infants, and flow rates were left as ordered by providers.
RESULTS. Bench measurements showed that, for any given leak size, there was a nearly linear relationship between flow rate and pressure. The highest pressure achieved was 4.5 cmH2O (flow rate: 8 L/minute; leak: 3 mm). In our study infants (postmenstrual age: 29.1–44.7 weeks; weight: 835–3735 g; flow rate: 1–5 L/minute), no pressure was generated with the mouth open at any flow rate. With the mouth closed, the oral cavity pressure was related to both flow rate and weight. For infants of ≤1500 g, there was a linear relationship between flow rate and oral cavity pressure.
CONCLUSIONS. Oral cavity pressure can estimate the level of continuous positive airway pressure. Continuous positive airway pressure generated with heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula treatment depends on the flow rate and weight. Only in the smallest infants with the highest flow rates, with the mouth fully closed, can clinically significant but unpredictable levels of continuous positive airway pressure be achieved. We conclude that heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula should not be used as a replacement for delivering continuous positive airway pressure.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference16 articles.
1. Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH. Continuous positive airway pressure. In: Goldsmith JP, Karotkin EH, eds. Assisted Ventilation of the Neonate. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2003:127–147
2. Polin RA, Sahni R. Newer experience with CPAP. Semin Neonatol. 2002;7:379–389
3. Finer NN. Nasal cannula use in the preterm infant: oxygen or pressure?Pediatrics. 2005;116:1216–1217
4. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, Osiovich H. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1081–1083
5. Locke RG, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH, Rubenstein SD, Greenspan JS. Inadvertent administration of positive end-distending pressure during nasal cannula flow. Pediatrics. 1993;91:135–138
Cited by
214 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献