Abstract
Health care professionals may have moral objections to particular medical interventions. They may refuse to provide or cooperate in the provision of these interventions. Such objections are referred to as conscientious objections. Although it may be difficult to characterize or validate claims of conscience, respecting the individual physician's moral integrity is important. Conflicts arise when claims of conscience impede a patient's access to medical information or care. A physician's conscientious objection to certain interventions or treatments may be constrained in some situations. Physicians have a duty to disclose to prospective patients treatments they refuse to perform. As part of informed consent, physicians also have a duty to inform their patients of all relevant and legally available treatment options, including options to which they object. They have a moral obligation to refer patients to other health care professionals who are willing to provide those services when failing to do so would cause harm to the patient, and they have a duty to treat patients in emergencies when referral would significantly increase the probability of mortality or serious morbidity. Conversely, the health care system should make reasonable accommodations for physicians with conscientious objections.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference22 articles.
1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion No. 385: the limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1203–1208
2. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. CEJA Report 6-A-07: Physician Objection to Treatment and Individual Patient Discrimination. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2007. Available at: www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/mm/369/ceja_6a07.pdf. Accessed December 2, 2008
3. General Medical Council. Personal Beliefs and Medical Practice. London, England: General Medical Council; 2008. Available at: www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/ethical_guidance/personal_beliefs/personal_beliefs.asp. Accessed December 2, 2008
4. Stein R. Pharmacists' rights at front of new debate; because of beliefs, some refuse to fill birth control prescriptions. Washington Post. 2005:A1, A10
5. British Medical Association. The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors. J Med Ethics. 2004;30(3):259–263
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献