Pediatricians' Perceptions of and Preferred Timing for Pediatric Palliative Care

Author:

Thompson Lindsay A.12,Knapp Caprice23,Madden Vanessa3,Shenkman Elizabeth23

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pediatrics

2. Epidemiology and Health Policy

3. Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. This study investigates how pediatricians define palliative care and their preferences regarding the timing of referrals for children with life-limiting diseases. METHODS. A random sample of 800 pediatricians in Florida and California received mail and online surveys. Analyses included descriptive and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS. Of all respondents (N = 303), 49.1% were female, 34.0% had been practicing for ≥20 years, 44.2% were members of a racial/ethnic minority, and 76.2% were in private practice. Pediatricians were divided in their definitions of palliative care; 41.9% defined it as hospice care, 31.9% offered alternative definitions, and 26.2% did not know. Although pediatricians overwhelmingly cited the need for many types of palliative care services, only 49.3% had ever referred patients to palliative care and 29.4% did not know whether local services existed. For 13 diseases that vary in life limitation, there was no consensus regarding the timing of referrals. Diversity across diseases predicted the most variation in referrals, whereas pediatrician characteristics did not. CONCLUSIONS. Despite recommendations to refer children to palliative care early in the course of illness, most pediatricians define palliative care as similar to hospice care and refer patients once curative therapy is no longer an option. Creating a more-practical definition of care, one that emphasizes an array of services throughout the course of an illness, as opposed to hospice care, may increase earlier palliative care referrals for children with life-limiting illnesses.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3