Affiliation:
1. Departments of Family Medicine, Community and Preventive Medicine, and Oncology, School of Medicine
2. School of Nursing, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
Abstract
Recent data suggest that that the United States is failing to make significant progress toward the Healthy People 2010 goal of eliminating health disparities. One missing element from the US strategy for achieving this goal is a focus on gaps in child development and achievement. Academic achievement and education seem to be critical determinants of health across the life span and disparities in one contribute to disparities in the other. Despite these linkages, national policy treats child education and health as separate. Landmark education legislation, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, is due for Congressional reauthorization. It seeks to eliminate gaps in academic child achievement by 2014. It does so by introducing accountability for states, school districts, and schools. In this special article, we review health disparities and contributors to child achievement gaps. We review changes in achievement gaps over time and potential contributors to the limited success of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, including its unfunded mandates and unfounded assumptions. We conclude with key reforms, which include addressing gaps in child school readiness through adequate investment in child health and early education and reductions in child poverty; closing the gap in child achievement by ensuring equity in school accountability standards; and, importantly, ensuring equity in school funding so that resources are allocated on the basis of the needs of the students. This will ensure that schools, particularly those serving large numbers of poor and minority children, have the resources necessary to promote optimal learning.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference128 articles.
1. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110, 20 U.S.C. Available at: www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107–110.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2008
2. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. No Child Left Behind: a desk reference. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education; 2002. Available at: www.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2008
3. Sunderman GL, Orfield G. Domesticating a revolution: No Child Left Behind reforms and state administrative response. Harvard Educ Rev. 2006;76(4):526–556
4. Borkowski JW, Sneed M. Will NCLB improve or harm public education?Harvard Educ Rev. 2006;76(4):503–552
5. Rothstein, R. “Proficiency for All: An Oxymoron.” Paper prepared for the Symposium, “Examining America's Commitment to Closing Achievement Gaps: NCLB and Its Alternatives,” sponsored by the Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University, November 13–14, 2006
Cited by
142 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献