Affiliation:
1. Departments of Pediatrics
2. Medical Education
3. Family Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Incorporating Healthy Steps for Young Children into pediatric practice has been shown to have positive effects for children and families. Although this model of care has also been integrated into several pediatric and family medicine training programs, published reports to date have focused only on residents’ perceptions of their interactions with the model of care. In this study, we report the impact on primary care outcomes after integrating Healthy Steps for Young Children into residency training.
METHODS. Continuity of care, longitudinal care in the practice, quality of primary care services, and rates of behavioral, developmental, and psychosocial diagnoses were measured for 3 cohorts: (1) Healthy Steps–enrolled children, (2) non–Healthy Steps–enrolled children who were followed at the same site of care, and (3) non–Healthy Steps–enrolled children who were receiving primary care at a similar residency training site within the same training program. All data were extracted from patient charts at the 2 practice sites.
RESULTS. Continuity of care was significantly better for Healthy Steps–enrolled children compared with non–Healthy Steps–enrolled children at the Healthy Steps site for both total visits and health maintenance visits. Longitudinal care and quality of primary care services did not differ within or between sites. The rates of documentation of behavioral, developmental, or psychosocial diagnoses did not differ between Healthy Steps–enrolled and non–Healthy Steps–enrolled children at the Healthy Steps for Young Children site but were significantly different between the Healthy Steps and the non–Healthy Steps for Young Children sites; the effect was driven wholly by differences in psychosocial diagnoses.
CONCLUSIONS. Multiple indices that measure health service outcomes suggest benefits of incorporating Healthy Steps for Young Children into pediatric residency training. Most important, continuity of care in residents’ practices significantly improved, as did the residents’ documentation of psychosocial issues in children.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference27 articles.
1. Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education. Program Requirements for Residency Education in Pediatrics. Chicago, IL: Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education; 2006:1–44
2. Leslie L, Rappo P, Abelson H, et al. Final Report of the FOPE II Pediatric Generalists of the Future Workgroup. Pediatrics. 2000;106(suppl):1199–1223
3. Dumont-Driscoll MC, Barbian LT, Pollock BH. Pediatric residents’ continuity clinics: how are we really doing?Pediatrics. 1995;96:616–621
4. Garfunkel LC, Byrd RS, McConnochie KM, Auinger P. Resident and family continuity in pediatric continuity clinic: nine years of observation. Pediatrics. 1998;101:37–42
5. Wilson MEH, Weiner JP, Bender JL, Berstrom SK, Starfield BH. Does a resident's continuity clinic provide primary care?Am J Dis Child. 1989;143:809–812
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献