Development and Validity of a 2-Item Screen to Identify Families at Risk for Food Insecurity

Author:

Hager Erin R.1,Quigg Anna M.12,Black Maureen M.1,Coleman Sharon M.3,Heeren Timothy3,Rose-Jacobs Ruth4,Cook John T.4,de Cuba Stephanie A. Ettinger3,Casey Patrick H.5,Chilton Mariana6,Cutts Diana B.7,Meyers Alan F.4,Frank Deborah A.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland;

2. Department of Psychology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland;

3. Data Coordinating Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts;

4. Department of Pediatrics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts;

5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas;

6. Department of Health Management and Policy, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and

7. Department of Pediatrics, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a brief screen to identify families at risk for food insecurity (FI) and to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and convergent validity of the screen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Caregivers of children (age: birth through 3 years) from 7 urban medical centers completed the US Department of Agriculture 18-item Household Food Security Survey (HFSS), reports of child health, hospitalizations in their lifetime, and developmental risk. Children were weighed and measured. An FI screen was developed on the basis of affirmative HFSS responses among food-insecure families. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. Convergent validity (the correspondence between the FI screen and theoretically related variables) was assessed with logistic regression, adjusted for covariates including study site; the caregivers' race/ethnicity, US-born versus immigrant status, marital status, education, and employment; history of breastfeeding; child's gender; and the child's low birth weight status. RESULTS: The sample included 30 098 families, 23% of which were food insecure. HFSS questions 1 and 2 were most frequently endorsed among food-insecure families (92.5% and 81.9%, respectively). An affirmative response to either question 1 or 2 had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 83% and was associated with increased risk of reported poor/fair child health (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.56; P < .001), hospitalizations in their lifetime (aOR: 1.17; P < .001), and developmental risk (aOR: 1.60; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-item FI screen was sensitive, specific, and valid among low-income families with young children. The FI screen rapidly identifies households at risk for FI, enabling providers to target services that ameliorate the health and developmental consequences associated with FI.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference27 articles.

1. Nord M, Andrews M, Carlson S. Household food security in the United States, 2008. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR83. Accessed May 10, 2010

2. Nord M, Andrews M, Carlson S. Household food security in the United States, 2007. Available at: www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/ERR66. Accessed May 10, 2010

3. Food insufficiency, family income, and health in US preschool and school-aged children;Alaimo;Am J Public Health,2001

4. Food security, poverty, and human development in the United States;Cook;Ann N Y Acad Sci,2008

5. Food insecurity is associated with adverse health outcomes among human infants and toddlers;Cook;J Nutr,2004

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3