Drowning in a Sea of Advice: Pediatricians and American Academy of Pediatrics Policy Statements

Author:

Belamarich Peter F.1,Gandica Rachelle2,Stein Ruth E. K.1,Racine Andrew D.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York

2. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of New York, Columbia University, New York, New York

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The proliferation of policy statements from the American Academy of Pediatrics presents pediatricians with an increasing amount of health advice to deliver, yet no quantitative estimates of pediatric health advice expectations exist in the literature. The objective of this study was to quantify and characterize verbal health advice that pediatricians are expected to deliver to patients/guardians. METHODS. The authors read and coded the 344 American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements that are contained in the American Academy of Pediatrics' Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines and Policies, Third Edition, and identified 57 policies that contained health advice directives that are broadly relevant to pediatric practice. We extracted the individual advice text to a database in which we also coded its date of issue, its theme, and whether (1) it was duplicated in another policy, (2) a screening question was required to identify a target population for the advice, (3) handouts or other aids to delivering the advice were referenced in the policy itself, or (4) the text of the statement referred to evidence of the effectiveness of office-based delivery of the advice. RESULTS. These 57 policies were found to contain 192 discrete health advice directives that pediatricians are expected to deliver to patients/guardians. Seven (4%) of these directives originated before 1993, and 185 (96%) were created from 1993 to 2002. After removal of the 30 (16%) duplicates, safety advice composed 67%, media use composed 12%, substance abuse composed 5%, environmental health hazards composed 4%, development/emotional health composed 4%, sexuality and pregnancy composed 3%, nutrition composed 2%, and miscellaneous composed 3%. In 41% of the directives, a screening question was required to identify the target population for the advice. Aids to delivering advice were referenced in 20% of the policies. In no policy statements did the text refer to evidence that office-based counseling was an effective method to achieve the desired health or behavioral outcome. CONCLUSIONS. We examined the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements and found 162 different verbal health advice directives on which pediatricians should counsel parents and patients throughout childhood. The expectation that delivery of all of this advice can be achieved is unrealistic. Moreover, none of the reviewed statements were found to include an evidence-based discussion of the efficacy of the suggested advice. In light of these findings, we suggest that committees should consider both the feasibility and the evidence of efficacy of office-based health advice when generating future policy statements.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference37 articles.

1. Fried VM, Makuc DM, Rooks RN. Ambulatory health care visits by children: principal diagnosis and place of visit. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 1998;(137):13

2. Green M, Palfrey JS, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 2nd ed., rev. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 2002

3. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. Recommendations for pediatric preventive health care. Pediatrics. 2000;105:645

4. US Preventive Services Task Force. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: www.ahrq.gov/clinic/prevenix.htm. Accessed February 28, 2006

5. American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines & Policies. 5th ed. Elk Grove, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2005

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3