Patient Visits to a National Practice-Based Research Network: Comparing Pediatric Research in Office Settings With the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Author:

Slora Eric J.1,Thoma Kathleen A.1,Wasserman Richard C.12,Pedlow Steven E.3,Bocian Alison B.1

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Research in Office Settings, American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, Illinois

2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

3. National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. Our objective with this study was to assess the extent to which patients who are seen by practitioners in Pediatric Research in Office Settings, a national primary care practice–based research network, are representative of those who are seen in ambulatory office–based pediatric primary care in the United States. METHODS. Pediatric Research in Office Settings patient data were collected from the offices of 57 randomly selected network practitioners as part of an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–funded effort to describe primary care visits and replicate the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey in primary care practice–based research networks. These data were from 1706 randomly selected pediatric patient visits that occurred between March and June 2002. National comparison data were 948 randomly selected pediatric patient visits that occurred between March and June 2000 in the offices of the 33 primary care pediatric practitioners who had participated in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. The groups were compared on patient demographics (age, gender, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, as represented by Medicaid status), visit characteristics (percentages of patients referred, practitioner designation of visit as acute versus nonacute, and continuity of care), the top patient/parent-articulated reasons for visit, and the top practitioner diagnoses. RESULTS. Comparisons revealed substantial similarities between Pediatric Research in Office Settings and national data, including gender, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and visit characteristics. Differences were noted for age and race, with Pediatric Research in Office Settings children approximately 1 year older and comprising a significantly lower proportion of black patients than their National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey counterparts. Although the top 6 reasons that were articulated by parents for outpatient visits in the 2 groups were remarkably similar in rank order and proportions, there were overall differences, mostly attributable to a larger number of the “other” category in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings cases. There were no significant differences among the top 5 practitioner visit diagnoses between the Pediatric Research in Office Settings and National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey data. CONCLUSIONS. The Pediatric Research in Office Settings patient population is reasonably representative of patients who are seen in US ambulatory office-based pediatric primary care practices; therefore, the Pediatric Research in Office Settings is an appropriate laboratory for studies of care in such settings.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference20 articles.

1. Nelson EC, Kirk JW, Bise BW, et al. The Cooperative Information Project: part 1—a sentinel practice network for service and research in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1981;13:641–649

2. Green LA, Lutz LL. Notions about networks: primary care practices in pursuit of improved primary care. In: Mayfield J, Grady ML, eds. Primary Care Research: An Agenda for the 90s. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1990:125–132DHHS publication (PHS) 90-3460

3. Charney E. Collaborative research: once more into the breach. Pediatrics. 1988;82:510–511

4. Nutting PA. Practice-based research: laboratories for outcomes and effectiveness research. In: Hibbard H, Nutting PA, Grady ML, eds. Primary Care Research: Theory and Methods. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy Research; 1991:277–281. AHCPR publication (PHS) 91-0011

5. Stange KC. Practice-based research networks: their current level of validity, generalizability, and potential for wider application. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:921–923

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3