Does Cause of Deafness Influence Outcome After Cochlear Implantation in Children?

Author:

Nikolopoulos Thomas P.1,Archbold Sue M.2,O'Donoghue Gerard M.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Athens University, Hippokration Hospital, Athens, Greece

2. Nottingham Pediatric Cochlear Implant Programme, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term speech perception abilities of comparable groups of postmeningitic and congenitally deaf children after cochlear implantation. METHODS. This prospective longitudinal study comprised 46 postmeningitic deaf children and 83 congenitally deaf children with age at implantation of ≤5.6 years. Both groups were comparable with respect to educational setting and mode of communication and included children with additional disabilities. RESULTS. Both postmeningitic and congenitally deaf children showed significant progress after implantation. Most (73% and 77%, respectively) could understand conversation without lip-reading or use the telephone with a known speaker 5 years after implantation, whereas none could do so before implantation. At the same interval, the postmeningitic and congenitally deaf children scored a mean open-set speech perception score of 47 (range: 0–91) and 46 (range: 0–107) words per minute, respectively, on connected discourse tracking. The respective mean scores at the 3-year interval were 22 and 29 correct words per minute, respectively. None of these children could score a single correct word per minute before implantation. The progress in both groups was statistically significant. When the 2 groups were compared, there was no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION. Postmeningitic and congenitally deaf children showed significant improvement in their auditory receptive abilities at the 3- and 5-year intervals after cochlear implantation. There was no statistically significant difference between the outcomes of the 2 groups, suggesting that, provided that children receive an implant early, cause of deafness has little influence on outcome. Although the prevalence of other disabilities was similar in both groups, for individual children, their presence may have profound impact. The study supports the concept of implantation early in life, irrespective of the cause of deafness.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference33 articles.

1. Shannon RV. The psychophysics of cochlear implant stimulation. In: Owens E, Kessler DK, eds. Cochlear Implants in Young Deaf Children. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co; 1989:21–22

2. Staller SJ, Dowell RC, Beiter AL, Brimacombe JA. Perceptual abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 1991;12(suppl):34S–47S

3. Boothroyd A, Geers AE, Moog JS. Practical implications of cochlear implants in children. Ear Hear. 1991;12(suppl 4):815–875

4. Gantz B, Tyler R, Woodworth G, Tye-Murray N, Fryauf-Bertschy H. Results of multichannel cochlear implants in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. Am J Otol. 1994;15(suppl 2):1–7

5. Waltzman SB, Cohen N, Gomolin RH, Shapiro WH, Ozdamar SR, Hoffman RA. Long-term results of early cochlear implantation in congenitally and prelingually deafened children. Am J Otol. 1994;15(suppl 2):9–13

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3