Affiliation:
1. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine
2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of General and Community Pediatrics and the Center for the Advancement of Underserved Children
3. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy/Immunology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin and Children's Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
4. National Outcomes Center, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, and Children's Research Institute, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. We sought to study the impact of emergency department (ED)–based intensive primary care linkage and initiation of asthma case management on long-term, patient-oriented outcomes for children with an asthma exacerbation.
METHODS. Our study was a randomized, 3-arm, parallel-group, single-blind clinical trial. Children aged 2 through 17 years treated in a pediatric ED for acute asthma were randomly assigned to standard care (group 1), including patient education, a written care plan, and instructions to follow up with the primary care provider within 7 days, or 1 of 2 interventions. Group 2 received standard care plus assistance with scheduling follow-up, while group 3 received the above interventions, plus enrollment in a case management program.
OUTCOMES. The primary outcome was the proportion of children having an ED visit for asthma within 6 months. Other outcomes included change in quality-of-life score and controller-medication use.
RESULTS. Three hundred fifty-two children were enrolled; 78% completed follow-up, 69% were black, and 70% had persistent asthma. Of the children, 37.8% had a subsequent ED visit for asthma, with no difference among the treatment groups (group 1: 38.4%; group 2, 39.2%; group 3, 35.8%). Children in all groups had a substantial, but similar, increase in their quality-of-life score. Controller-medication use increased from 69.4% to 81.4%, with no difference among the groups.
CONCLUSION. ED-based attempts to improve primary care linkage or initiate case management are no more effective than our standard ED care in improving subsequent asthma outcomes over a 6-month period.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference27 articles.
1. National Center for Health Statistics. Asthma prevalence, health care use and mortality, 2002. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/asthma/asthma.htm. Accessed February 27, 2006
2. Stevens MW, Gorelick MH. Short-term outcomes after acute treatment of pediatric asthma. Pediatrics. 2001;107:1357–1362
3. Newacheck PW, Halfon N. Prevalence, impact, and trends in childhood disability due to asthma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:287–293
4. Singer AJ, Camargo CA Jr, Lampell M, et al. A call for expanding the role of the emergency physician in the care of patients with asthma. Ann Emerg Med. 2005;45:295–301
5. Lara M, Rosenbaum S, Rachelefsky G, et al. Improving childhood asthma outcomes in the United States: a blueprint for policy action. Pediatrics. 2002;109:919–930
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献