Medicaid Acceptance and Availability of Timely Follow-up for Newborns With Medicaid

Author:

Galbraith Alison A.1,Grossman David C.234,Koepsell Thomas D.356,Heagerty Patrick J.67,Christakis Dimitri A.4689

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. Department of Preventive Care and Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington

3. Health Services

4. Pediatrics

5. Epidemiology

6. Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program

7. Department of Biostatistics

8. Child Health Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

9. Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

Objective. Decreased physician participation in Medicaid has been shown to affect adversely timeliness of adult acute care and pediatric specialty care, but it is not clear whether this is the case for newborn follow-up. The objectives of this study were to determine whether there is a difference within clinics in the timeliness of follow-up appointments that are given to newborns with Medicaid compared with newborns with private insurance and to determine whether there is a difference between clinics that do and do not accept Medicaid in the timeliness of appointments that are given for newborn follow-up. Methods. A randomized crossover study was conducted among general pediatric clinics and practices that were identified from the yellow pages and Internet searches of hospitals and health departments in 8 metropolitan areas from September 2003 to March 2004. A simulated parent telephoned clinics to find the earliest available appointment for a 1-day-old infant who needed routine follow-up after discharge that day. Clinics were randomly assigned to receive a first call from a patient with either Medicaid or private insurance; each clinic received the same call at least 3 weeks later with the patient's insurance status reversed. The main outcome measure was whether the appointment was timely (≤2 days from the day of the call). Results. Of 401 participating clinics, 22% did not accept Medicaid. Among clinics that accepted Medicaid, availability of a timely appointment for a newborn with Medicaid was similar to that for a newborn with private insurance (87% vs 90%, respectively). Appointments that were provided to privately insured newborns were as likely to be timely in clinics that accept Medicaid as in clinics that do not accept Medicaid (89.5% vs 93.4%, respectively). However, providing timely appointments was significantly less likely in clinics that were in high-poverty locations compared with clinics that were not (86.1% vs 92.7%, respectively). Conclusions. Although newborns with Medicaid did not have access to >20% of clinics because of their insurance, among clinics that did accept Medicaid, timeliness of available follow-up was similar for newborns with Medicaid compared with newborns with private insurance and similar between clinics that did and did not accept Medicaid. However, to the extent that care for newborns with Medicaid is concentrated in clinics in high-poverty areas, some newborns with Medicaid may not be able to receive timely appointments.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference31 articles.

1. Wood DL, Hayward RA, Corey CR, Freeman HE, Shapiro MF. Access to medical care for children and adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics. 1990;86:666–673

2. Newacheck PW, Pearl M, Hughes DC, Halfon N. The role of Medicaid in ensuring children's access to care. JAMA. 1998;280:1789–1793

3. St. Peter RF, Newacheck PW, Halfon N. Access to care for poor children. Separate and unequal?JAMA. 1992;267:2760–2764

4. Yudkowsky BK, Tang S, Siston A. Pediatrician participation in Medicaid/SCHIP. American Academy of Pediatrics. Available at: www.aap.org/statelegislation/med-schip/ped_part.htm. Accessed November 5, 2001

5. Iglehart JK. The dilemma of Medicaid. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2140–2148

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3