Ethics at the Margins of Viability

Author:

Meadow William1

Affiliation:

1. Professor of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.

Abstract

In this article, I discuss traditional philosophical descriptions of how to approach the ethical dilemmas presented by infants born at the margins of viability (currently, 23–24 weeks’ gestation). I then juxtapose these philosophical approaches to what might be called evidence-based ethics, in which the evidence in question is the predictive power of physicians to counsel parents regarding the likely outcome of these infants either before or after delivery. I suggest that the predictive power of data available before delivery are insufficient to allow a rational best-interests decision to be made, and that data available after birth promote a more nuanced approach to ethical decision-making for this difficult problem.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3