Evaluation of Neonatal Intensive Care for Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants in Victoria Over Two Decades: II. Efficiency

Author:

Doyle Lex W.,

Abstract

Context. Although the increasing effectiveness of neonatal programs for extremely low birth weight (ELBW, birth weight <1000 g) infants has been established from cohort studies, there is a paucity of data on the relationship between the costs and the consequences of neonatal intensive care. Objective. To determine the changes in the efficiency of neonatal intensive care for ELBW infants in Victoria, Australia over 2 decades. Design. Economic evaluation (cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses) in a population-based cohort study of consecutive ELBW infants born during 4 distinct eras (1979–1980, 1985–1987, 1991–1992, and 1997) followed to at least 2 years of age. Setting. The state of Victoria. Patients. All ELBW live births of birth weight 500 to 999 g in the state in the calendar years indicated (1979–1980: n = 351; 1985–1987: n = 560; 1991–1992: n = 429; 1997: n = 233). Main Outcome Measures. Costs were assessed primarily by the consumption of hospital resources. The consequences included survival and quality-adjusted survival rates at 2 years of age. Results. The cost-effectiveness ratios (expressed in Australian dollars for 1997) were similar between successive eras at $5270, $3130, and $4050 per life-year gained, respectively. The cost-utility ratios were similar between successive eras at $5270, $3690, and $5850 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively, and were similar to the cost-effectiveness ratios. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility ratios were generally higher in lower birth-weight subgroups, but there were consistent gains in efficiency over time in infants of lower birth weight. Conclusions. As there have been large increases in effectiveness from the late 1970s to the late 1990s, the efficiency of neonatal intensive care for ELBW infants in Victoria has remained relatively stable.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3