First Experiences With Early Intervention: A National Perspective

Author:

Bailey Donald B.1,Hebbeler Kathleen2,Scarborough Anita1,Spiker Donna2,Mallik Sangeeta2

Affiliation:

1. Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

2. SRI International, Menlo Park, California

Abstract

Background. Families of young children with disabilities are eligible for early intervention services as mandated by Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Although prior research has shown that families are generally satisfied with early intervention, this research has not been based on a nationally representative sample of families, nor has it systematically examined perceptions of the initial experiences entering early intervention. Objective. This study was designed to determine families’ initial experiences in determining their child’s eligibility, interactions with medical professionals, effort required to obtain services, participation in planning for services, satisfaction with services, and interactions with professionals. Method. We interviewed a nationally representative sample of 3338 parents of young children with or at risk for disability. All the children had recently entered an early intervention program operated under the auspices of Part C of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Results. The average age at which families reported a concern about their child was 7.4 months. A diagnosis was made, on average, 1.4 months later, the child was referred for early intervention an average of 5.2 months after the diagnosis, and the individualized family service plan was developed 1.7 months later or at an average age of 15.7 months. Most families were very positive about their entry into early intervention programs. They reported discussing their concerns with a medical professional and finding that person helpful. Families reported relative ease in accessing services, felt that services were related to their perceived needs, rated positively the professionals working in early intervention, and felt that they had a role in making key decisions about child and family goals. A small percentage of families experienced significant delays in getting services, wanted more involvement in service planning, or felt that services were inadequate, and nearly 20% were unaware of the existence of a written plan for services. Minority families, families with limited income, and families with less-educated mothers were more likely to report negative experiences. Conclusions. We conclude that the beginning of early intervention services generally is highly successful and responsive, a finding that should give pediatricians more confidence in referring families for early intervention services. However, research and local evaluation efforts are needed to develop strategies to assure that all families receive services in a timely and appropriate fashion.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference30 articles.

1. Reschly DJ. Identification and assessment of students with disabilities. Future Child.1996;6:40–53

2. US Department of Education. To Assure the Free Appropriate Public Education of All Children With Disabilities: Twenty-third Annual Report to Congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: US Department of Education; 2001

3. Bailey DB, Aytch LS, Odom SL, Symons F, Wolery M. Early intervention as we know it. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev.1999;5:11–20

4. Spiker D, Hebbeler K, Wagner M, Cameto R, McKenna P. A framework for describing variations in state early intervention systems. Top Early Child Spec Educ.2000;20:195–207

5. Spiker D, Hebbeler K. Early intervention services. In: Levine M, Carey WB, Crocker AC, eds. Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics. Third ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1999:793–802

Cited by 198 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3