Adoption of Reminder and Recall Messages for Immunizations by Pediatricians and Public Health Clinics

Author:

Tierney Cheryl D.1,Yusuf Hussain2,McMahon Shawn R.2,Rusinak Donna3,O’ Brien Megan A.3,Massoudi Mehran S.2,Lieu Tracy A.34

Affiliation:

1. Harvard Combined Pediatric Health Services Research Fellowship Program, Boston, Massachusetts

2. National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia

3. Center for Child Healthcare Studies, Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare and Harvard Medical School

4. Division of General Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Objective. Strong scientific evidence and national recommendations support the use of reminder and recall messages to improve immunization coverage rates, yet reports have suggested that only a minority of pediatric practices use such messages. Our aims were to 1) determine the proportions of pediatric practices and public clinics that currently use practice-based reminder or recall messages and routinely undergo immunization assessment efforts, 2) evaluate barriers and supports to implementing these practices, and 3) identify predictors of either current use or plans for future adoption of these practices. Methods. This study combined qualitative and quantitative methods in sequential phases. In the qualitative phase, we conducted semistructured, open-ended interviews with a convenience sample of 18 clinician-administrators representing adopters and nonadopters of these messages in both private practices and public health clinics. In the subsequent quantitative phase, we mailed a structured, closed-ended survey to national samples of randomly selected pediatricians (n = 600) and public clinics (n = 600). Results. Response rates were 75% for pediatricians and 77% for public clinics. Among pediatricians, 38% were conducting regular assessments of immunization coverage but only 16% were currently using routine reminder or recall messages. Among public clinics, 85% were conducting regular assessments and 51% were using reminder or recall messages. Among pediatricians’ practices, the most commonly reported barriers to the adoption of reminder or recall messages were lack of time and funding and the inability to identify children at specified ages. For pediatricians’ practices, the strongest predictors of current use of reminder or recall messages were having a champion who led efforts to improve immunization delivery (odds ratio: 1.85; 95% confidence interval: 1.08–3.18) and current use of regular immunization assessments (odds ratio: 2.30; 95% confidence interval: 1.33–3.84). Likewise, for public health clinics, having a champion to lead immunization improvement efforts and believing that their current system needed improvement was associated with current use of reminder or recall messages. Conclusions. Reminder and recall messages remain underused by both pediatricians and public health clinics. Promising strategies to promote adoption of these approaches in both the private and the public sectors include identifying and training champions to promote immunization delivery improvement efforts and helping practices develop methods to identify children at specific ages.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference27 articles.

1. National Immunization Program. Immunization coverage in the U.S. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nip/coverage/#NIS. Accessed June 1, 2002

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19–35 months—United States, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep.2002;51:664–665

3. US Department of Health and Human Services. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health. In: Healthy People 2010. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2000:14-35–14-37

4. Szilagyi PG. Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: a review. JAMA.2000;284:1820–1827

5. Shefer A, Briss PA, Rodewald L. Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiol Rev.1999;21:96–142

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3