Author:
Raišienė Agota Giedrė,Raišys Simonas Juozapas
Abstract
Innovations provide a competitive advantage for modern organizations. However, commercializing innovations can be a significant and costly challenge that requires specific knowledge and considerable resources. Therefore, companies need to prioritize the most significant ones. Responding to the relevance, the article examines enablers of innovation commercialization. In the study, innovation experts, including business consultants and professionals, gave priority to theoretically based factors of innovation commercialization using AHP and RII methods. The study found that expert decision support is limited in helping to make decisions. Experts agree on the least significant factors of innovation commercialization but disagree on the priority ones. Furthermore, the study demonstrates that the level of ambition within an organization's activities is a crucial factor in determining the priority of innovation commercialization. These results invite a fresh perspective on the expert assistance.
Publisher
Centre of Sociological Research, NGO
Reference79 articles.
1. Al-Jobor, G. S., Al-Weshah, G. A., Al-Nsour, M., Abuhashesh, M., & Masa’deh, R. (2020). The Role of Product Innovation and Flexibility as Competitive Priorities in Gaining Market Share: Empirical Evidences from Jordanian Manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Systematic Innovation, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.6977/IJoSI.202009_6(2).0003
2. Appel, G., & Muller, E. (2021). Adopter Categories and Saddles, revisited: Innovators, Main Market and Laggards, where are they today? (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3770167). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3770167
3. Ardito, L., & Svensson, R. (2023). Sourcing applied and basic knowledge for innovation and commercialization success. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-023-10011-3
4. Akins, R.B., Tolson, H. & Cole, B.R. (2005). Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol., 5, 37. https://doi.org/1471-2288-5-37
5. Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Guerrero, M. (2022). The dynamic contribution of innovation ecosystems to schumpeterian firms: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Business Research, 144, 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.037