Effects of Quince Rootstocks and Pear Cultivars on Fruit and Yield Characteristics
Author:
KURT Tahsin1ORCID, ÖZTÜRK Ahmet2ORCID, FAIZI Zaki Ahmad3ORCID, POLAT Yakup4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ 2. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi | Ondokuz Mayıs University 3. ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE 4. Horticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Van Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Türkiye
Abstract
The research carried out to evaluate effects of quince rootstocks [Quince Province BA29 (BA29), Quince A(QA), Quince C (MC)], pear cultivars, and research years on fruit quality and yield efficiency in the years 2020-2021. The highest fruit weight was obtained from BA29 (196.02 g), the lowest from MC (158.09 g). In the cultivars the highest fruit weight was obtained from ‘Abate Fetel’ (210.85 g), the lowest from ‘Santa Maria’ (156.73 g). The highest number of fruits (17.06 pieces tree-1), yield per tree (3.13 kg tree-1), yield per hectare (5982.8 kg ha-1) and yield per trunk cross sectional area (0.30 kg cm-2) obtained from BA29 followed by QA. In the cultivars, highest number of fruits (19.60 pieces tree-1), yield per tree (2.98 kg tree-1), yield per hectare (5685.00 kg ha-1) obtained from ‘Santa Maria’. In the research years, pre-harvest fruit drop rate (PHFDR 11.04%) and black spotted fruit rate (BSFR 13.79%) observed to be higher in 2021, while marketable fruit rate (MFR 77.03%) observed to be higher in 2020. In the rootstocks, the highest PHFDR (11.24%) observed on BA29 rootstocks, while highest MFR (73.72%) recorded on QA. In terms of cultivars, the highest PHFDR (10.73%) observed in ‘Williams’, while highest BSFR (16.41%) in ‘Deveci’, and highest MFR (76.31%) in the ‘Santa Maria’. As a conclusion, the highest yield and marketable fruit rate obtained from ‘Santa Maria’ cultivar and yield from BA29 rootstock. It could be suggested semi-dwarf cultivars and rootstocks for suitably performs under high density pear orchards.
Funder
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi
Publisher
Yuzuncu Yil Universitesi Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi
Subject
General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Reference37 articles.
1. Askari, K. O., Jafarpour, M., Hadad, M. M., & Pessarakli, M. (2019). Fruit yield and quality characteristics of ‘Shahmiveh’ pear cultivar grafted on six rootstocks. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 42 (4), 323-332. doi:10.1080/01904167.2018.1555592 2. Bhat, R., Hussain, S., Sharma, M. K., & Singh, A. (2017). Effect of Growth Regulators on Growth, Yield and Quality of Pear cv. Carmen under high density planting. Division of Fruit Science, Sher-e-Kashmir University, Kashmir, India. 3. Cabrera, D., Rodriguez, P., & Zoppolo, R. (2015). Evaluation of Quince and Selected ‘Farold®’ Pear Rootstocks for Commercial ‘Williams B.C.’ Production in Uruguay. Acta Hort., 1094, 159-162. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1094.19 4. Erdem, H., & Ozturk, B. (2012). Yapraktan uygulanan çinko'nun BA29 anacı üzerine aşılı armut çeşitlerinin verimi, mineral element içeriği ve biyokimyasal özellikleri üzerine etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 93-106. 5. FAO. (2023). World pear production list. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL. Access date: 15 May 2023.
|
|