Affiliation:
1. Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University); Research Institute of Bases and Underground Structures named after N.M. Gersevanov, JSC Research Center of Construction
Abstract
Introduction. Slope reinforcement with dowels is the most economical and environmentally friendly method of their stabilization. However, the lack of theoretically substantiated schemes for optimal placement of dowels in groups, confirmed by tests in various conditions, leads to inefficient, often excessive use of the material in the arrangement of engineering protection.Aim. To determine the most effective arrangement of dowels in groups with regard to the overall stability of the reinformed soil mass. To assess quantitatively the stability depending on the spacing and shape of dowels in the group.Materials and methods. A review of international and Russian literature on the problem of assessing the influence of geometric parameters of dowel and anchor groups was carried out. According to the results of the review, primary calculations with the use of numerical simulation in the PLAXIS 3D software package was carried out.Results. The available publications mainly analyze configurations of screw anchor groups, paying insufficient attention the use of dowels of cylindrical cross-section. This fact substantiates further research in this field. The conducted numerical simulation allowed the slope stability provided by five dowel group configurations to be compared. The calculation results show that the slope stability depends on the configuration and the number of dowels in the group. The difference between the stability factors for the polygonal and triangular three-row configuration was 0.072 %, with the polygonal configuration requiring three dowels less. Selection of optimal dowel placement contributes to increased landslide control efficiency and reduced costs.Conclusions. The relevance and importance of studying the effect of dowel group configuration on slope stability, emphasizing the need for more in-depth and comprehensive research in this area.
Publisher
Joint Stock Company Research Center of Construction
Reference7 articles.
1. United States Federal Highway Administration. Recommendations clouterre 1991. Soil nailing recommendations –1991 for designing, calculating, constructing and inspecting earth support systems using soil nailing. Report No. FHWA-SA-93-026. U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Presses de L’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussees; 1993.
2. STO NOSTROI 2.5.126-2013. Underground space developing. Structure of ground anchorage, dowel pins and micropiles. Regulations, control of performance and requirements to the work results. Moscow; 2016. (In Russian).
3. Singh S., Shrivastava A.K. Effect of soil nailing on stability of slopes. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET). 2017;5(X):752–763. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2017.10109
4. Mahmoudi-Mehrizi M.E., Jalali-Moghadam M. Comparing the performance of helical anchors and directembedded plate anchors in cohesionless soil for top-down retaining walls stabilization: an experimental study. Journal of GeoEngineering. 2020;15(1):31–45. https://doi.org/10.6310/jog.202003_15(1).3
5. Ghaly A., Hanna A. Model investigation of the performance of single anchors and groups of anchors. Canadian Geotechnical Journal. 1994;31(2):273–284. https://doi.org/10.1139/t94-032