1. Despite common usage of the term “centrality,” its definition remains unclear. Several framings of centrality, such as “fulcrum of evolving regional architecture” and “driving force” of regionalism, indicate the notion that this term implies. See Malcolm Cook, “ASEAN’s Triumph,” Indo-Pacific Governance Research Centre Policy Brief, June 2011, https://www.adelaide.edu.au /indo-pacific-governance/policy/Malcolm_Cook.pdf (accessed April 21, 2015), p. 3;
2. K. Kesavapany, “Special Lecture on ASEAN Centrality in Regional Integration,” Institute of Southeast Asian Studies and Thailand Ministry of Foreign Affairs, February 26, 2010, http://asc.iseas.edu.sg /images/stories/pdf/asco07–10.pdf (accessed April 20, 2015).
3. ASEAN, “Chairman’s Statement of the 19th ASEAN Summit,” November 11, 2011, http://www.asean.org /archive/documents/19th%20summit/CS.pdf (accessed October 16, 2014).
4. ASEAN, “ASEAN Vision 2020,” adopted December 15, 1997, http://www.asean.org /news/item/asean-vision-2020 (accessed April 20, 2015).
5. ASEAN, “Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II),” adopted October 7, 2003, http://www.asean.org /news/item/declaration-of-asean-concord-ii-bali-concord-ii (accessed April 21, 2015);