Author:
Dau Luis Alfonso,Morck Randall,Yeung Bernard Yin
Abstract
AbstractThis paper harmonizes the business group literature in international business and across relevant fields within a unified theoretical framework. Business groups (firms under common control but with different, if overlapping, owners) are economically important in much of the world. Business groups’ economic significance co-evolves with their economies' institutions and market environments, patterns of particular interest to international business scholars. The vast literature on business groups raises discordant perspectives. This paper first proposes a unifying definition and provides a list of stylized historical observations on business groups across different parts of the world. It then develops a Coasean framework to harmonize seemingly disparate views from the literature by building on recent surveys and the stylized historical patterns of business groups. We enlist two concepts – fallacies of composition/decomposition and time inconsistency – to harmonize these perspectives. This yields a theoretical framework for understanding business groups that mobilizes concepts long-used to understand multinational enterprises: the economy's market and hierarchical transaction costs, openness, and their dynamic interactions. We then apply this framework to globalization and business group internationalization. This work leads to an overarching research agenda encompassing seemingly inconsistent prior work.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference451 articles.
1. Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P. & Zilibotti, F. 2006. Distance to frontier, selection & economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association 4(1): 37–74.
2. Adams, A., Cherchye, L., De Rock, B. & Verriest, E. 2014. Consume now or later? Time inconsistency, collective choice & revealed preference. American Economic Review, 104(12): 4147–83.
3. Adly, A. 2014. The Future of Big Business in the New Egypt. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
4. Aggarwal, R., Jindal, V. & Seth, R. 2019. Board diversity & firm performance: The role of business group affiliation. International Business Review, 28(6): 101600.
5. Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M. & Rey, P. 1997. Corporate governance, competition policy & industrial policy. European Economic Review, 41(3–5): 797–805.
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献