Abstract
AbstractAn underdog brand is a brand with humble resources that competes with passion and determination against competitors that dominate a market. Numerous anecdotal examples and a few research articles of underdog brands exist, yet the understanding of what an underdog brand is and how brands can use the underdog effect is still limited. Considering the relevance of underdog brand management for practice, the purpose of our article is to distill the components of the concepts “underdog brand” and “the underdog effect” and to propose a conceptual framework to guide underdog brand management. To achieve this goal, we undertook a systematic review of the extant literature that resulted in (1) a clear and demarking definition of the term underdog brand, (2) an analysis of the usefulness of the underdog effect and (3) a reference frame we termed “the underdog brand management framework”. By doing so, we helped to overcome the research gap in the field of underdog brand management. To validate our findings, we tested the framework against a case study of a successful underdog brand. Our analysis resulted in a robust model that could inspire and guide practitioners who are in charge of underdog brands.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Marketing,Strategy and Management
Reference93 articles.
1. Alpert, F.H., and M.A. Kamins. 1995. An empirical investigation of consumer memory, attitude, and perceptions toward pioneer and follower brands. Journal of Marketing 59 (4): 34–45.
2. Angell, R., P.A. Bottomley, and J.R. Doyle. 2016. Leicester City FC and the benefits of an underdog brand. Harvard Business Review 2016 (August): 2–5.
3. Anonymous. 2014. The underdog bites back: How emerging market multinationals succeed in global markets. Strategic Direction 30 (1): 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-12-2013-0096.
4. Baik, K.H., and J.F. Shogren. 1992. Strategic behavior in contests: Comment. The American Economic Review 82 (1): 359–362.
5. Barwise, P., and L. Watkins. 2018. The evolution of digital dominance. In Digital dominance: the power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple, ed. M. Moore and D. Tambini, 21–49. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献