Competition versus monopoly in the provision of police-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Competition versus monopoly in the provision of police

Published:2012-04-09 Issue:2 Volume:26 Page:157-179
ISSN:0955-1662
Container-title:Security Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Secur J

Author:

Blackstone Erwin A,Hakim Simon

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Strategy and Management,Safety Research

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/sj.2012.5.pdf

Reference67 articles.

1. Allied Security Holdings LLC. (2008) 10-K Report, 17 March.

2. Australian Trade Commission, Australian Government. (2008) US police use Australian security cameras, http://www.austrade.gov.au/US-police-use-Australian-security-cameras/default.aspx , accessed 7 February 2012.

3. Babic, M.J. (2011) The evolution of cybercrime. Michigan Literature Science and the Arts Magazine (MLSA), Spring, 26–36.

4. Bayley, D.H. and Shearing, C.D. (1996) The future of policing. Law & Society Review 30 (3): 585–606.

5. Bayley, D.H. and Shearing, C.D. (2001) The new structure of policing: Description, conceptualization, and research agenda. National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice (July), NCJ 187083.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. State or private security supply? An analysis from the institutional economics perspective;Security Journal;2023-03-16

2. Training and Education Within the Security Sector: Challenges and Opportunities for Development;The Handbook of Security;2022

3. State or Private Security Supply? An Analysis from the Institutional Economics Perspective;SSRN Electronic Journal;2022

4. Burglary reduction and improved police performance through private alarm response;International Review of Law and Economics;2020-09

5. Institutional hybridity and cultural isomorphism in contemporary policing;International Journal of Police Science & Management;2019-12