Behavioral Issues in the Practical Application of Scenario Thinking: Cognitive Biases, Effective Group Facilitation and Overcoming Business-as-Usual Thinking-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Behavioral Issues in the Practical Application of Scenario Thinking: Cognitive Biases, Effective Group Facilitation and Overcoming Business-as-Usual Thinking

Published:2016 Issue: Volume: Page:195-212
ISSN:
Container-title:Behavioral Operational Research
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Bryson Stephanie,Grime Megan,Murthy Adarsh,Wright George

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan UK

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/978-1-137-53551-1_10

Reference36 articles.

1. Ackerman, F., and C. Eden. 2012. Making strategy, mapping out strategic success. London: Sage.

2. Amason, A.C., and D.M. Schwieger. 1994. Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making and organisational performance. International Journal of Conflict Management 5: 236–253.

3. Bradfield, R. 2008. Cognitive barriers in the scenario development process. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10: 198–215.

4. Cairns, G., G. Wright, K. Van der Heijden, R. Bradfield, and G. Burt. 2006. Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: Issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 38: 1010–1025.

5. De Dreu, C. 2006. When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management 32: 83–107.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Integrating system dynamics and scenarios: A framework based on personal experience;FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE;2023-11-27

2. Participatory energy futures as decision support on subnational scales;Environmental Policy and Governance;2023-11-23

3. Competing for space? A multi-criteria scenario framework intended to model the energy–biodiversity–land nexus for regional renewable energy planning based on a German case study;Energy, Sustainability and Society;2023-08-10

4. From responsible to responsive innovation: A systemic and historically sensitive approach to innovation processes;Technological Forecasting and Social Change;2022-01

5. Scenario planning for transport practitioners;Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives;2021-09