The Nature and Effects of Adversarialism: Jury Decision-Making in Sexual Assault Trials
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
Reference51 articles.
1. Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2, 43–63.
2. Blackwell, S., & Seymour, F. (2014). Prediction of jury verdicts in child sexual assault trials. Psychiatry, Psychology & Law, 21, 567–576.
3. Bornstein, B. H., & Greene, E. (2011). Jury decision making: Implications for and from psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 63–67.
4. Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
5. Chaiken, S. & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.