Covid-19: implications for insurer risk management and the insurability of pandemic risk

Author:

Richter Andreas,Wilson Thomas C.

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyzes the insurability of pandemic risk and outlines how underwriting policies and scenario analysis are used to build resilience upfront and plan contingency actions for crisis scenarios. It then summarizes the unique “lessons learned” from the Covid-19 crisis by baselining actual developments against a reasonable, pre-Covid-19 pandemic scenario based on the 2002 SARS epidemic and 1918 Spanish influenza pandemic. Actual developments support the pre-Covid-19 hypothesis that financial market developments dominate claims losses due to the demographics of pandemics and other factors. However, Covid-19 “surprised” relative to the pre-Covid-19 scenario in terms of its impact on the real economy as well as on the property and casualty segment as business interruption property triggers and exclusions are challenged, something that may adversely impact the insurability of pandemics as well as the perception of the industry for some time to come. The unique lessons of Covid-19 reinforce the need for resilience upfront in solvency and liquidity, the need to improve business interruption wordings and re-underwrite the book, and the recognition that business interruption caused by pandemics may not be an insurable risk due to its large accumulation potential and the threat of external moral hazard. These insurability limitations lead to a discussion about the structure and financing of protection against the impact of future pandemics.

Funder

Ludwig-Maximilians-University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Accounting

Reference81 articles.

1. Athreya, K.B. 2009. Systemic risk and the pursuit of efficiency, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 2009 Annual Report, 3–20.

2. Autonomous. 2020. Insurance: Scaling the industry non-life loss, Research Report, 26 April 2020.

3. Baker, M. 2020. Pandemic bond trigger failure shows flaws of relying on reporting by poorest countries, Euromoney, 14 April 2020, https://www.euromoney.com/article/b1l64mpq0pjnln/pandemic-bond-trigger-failure-shows-flaws-of-relying-on-reporting-by-poorest-countries. Accessed 6 July 2020.

4. Bank for International Settlements (BIS). 2018. The G-SIB framework—Executive Summary, https://www.bis.org/fsi/fsisummaries/g-sib_framework.htm. Accessed 7 July 2020.

5. Berger, L. 2015. The impact of ambiguity and prudence on prevention decisions. Theory and Decision 80 (3): 389–409.

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3