Abstract
AbstractAmbiguity about the probability of loss is a salient feature of catastrophe risk insurance. Evidence shows that insurers charge higher premiums under ambiguity, but that they rely on simple heuristics to do so, rather than being able to turn to pricing tools that formally link ambiguity with the insurer’s underlying economic objective. In this paper, we apply an $$\alpha$$
α
-maxmin model of insurance pricing to two catastrophe model data sets relating to hurricane risk. The pricing model considers an insurer who maximises expected profit, but is sensitive to how ambiguity affects its risk of ruin. We estimate ambiguity loads and show how these depend on the insurer’s attitude to ambiguity, $$\alpha$$
α
. We also compare these results with those derived from applying model blending techniques that have recently gained popularity in the actuarial profession, and show that model blending can imply relatively low aversion to ambiguity, possibly ambiguity seeking.
Funder
Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference45 articles.
1. Alary, D., C. Gollier, and N. Treich. 2013. The effect of ambiguity aversion on insurance and self-protection. Economic Journal 123 (573): 1188–1202.
2. Alon, S. 2015. Worst-case expected utility. Journal of Mathematical Economics 60: 43–48.
3. Aydogan, I., L. Berger, V. Bosetti, et al. 2019. Economic rationality: Investigating the links between uncertainty, complexity, and sophistication. Technical report, IGIER Working Paper 653.
4. Berger, L. 2016. The impact of ambiguity and prudence on prevention decisions. Theory and Decision 80 (3): 389–409.
5. Berger, L.A., and H. Kunreuther. 1994. Safety first and ambiguity. Journal of Actuarial Practice 2 (2): 273–291.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献