In search of relevance: European political scientists and the public sphere in critical times

Author:

Real-Dato José,Verzichelli LucaORCID

Abstract

AbstractSocial relevance has become a key element to assess the social legitimacy of an academic discipline. This contrasts with a widespread sentiment among political scientists about the existence of a relevance gap. The context of multiple crises Europe has experienced since the late 2000s has provided political scientists with a multitude of opportunities to demonstrate the social relevance of their work and the usefulness of the discipline. This introductory article to the special issue aims to offer an explorative framework and a preliminary discussion of empirical examples to assess the phenomenon of political scientists’ relevance in the public sphere during recent turbulent times. The framework (which emphasises three basic dimensions of social relevance – partisanship, visibility, and impact) is used to interpret the main results of the five case studies included in the special issue. Results show that contextual factors (salience of the issue, political and media contexts) influence political scientists’ engagement in the public sphere, the role they adopt and their visibility. The article ends emphasising the importance of collective action within the discipline as an instrument to enhance its social relevance.

Funder

Università degli Studi di Siena

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference41 articles.

1. Bandola-Gill, J., M. Brans, and M. Flinders. 2021. Incentives for Impact: Relevance Regimes Through a Cross-National Perspective. In Political Science in the Shadow of the State: Research, Relevance & Deference, ed. R. Eisfeld and M. Flinders. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

2. Blumler, J.G., and M. Gurevitch. 1995. The Crisis of Public Communication. London: Routledge.

3. Brownlee, J., T. Masoud, and A. Reynolds. 2015. The Arab Spring: Pathways of Repression and Reform. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Büchel, F., E. Humprecht, L. Castro-Herrero, S. Engesser, and M. Brüggemann. 2016. Building Empirical Typologies with QCA: Toward a Classification of Media Systems. International Journal of Press/politics 21(2): 209–232.

5. Desch, M.C. 2019. Cult of the Irrelevant: The Waning Influence of Social Science on National Security. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3