Author:
Pleschová Gabriela,Simon Agnes
Abstract
AbstractThis study investigates the meso level impact of an academic development programme on internationalisation. We demonstrate the relevance of the framework of grassroots leadership in higher education in the Central European context and show how individual programme participants acting as grassroots leaders influence departmental attitudes and practices regarding internationalisation and student-centred learning. We identify two successful strategies—single-issue and multifaceted—for grassroots leadership. The study finds that established faculty member participants who are also active as grassroots leaders facilitate the spreading of the influence of an internationalisation programme beyond the individual level, highlighting the differences and similarities in the activism of faculty grassroots leaders in Central Europe vis-à-vis the USA.
Funder
Comenius University in Bratislava
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Amundsen, C., and L. D’Amico. 2019. Using theory of change to evaluate socially-situated, inquiry-based academic professional development. Studies in Educational Evaluation 61(5): 196–208.
2. Bernal, D.D. 1998. Grassroots leadership reconceptualized: Chicana oral histories and the 1968 East Los Angeles school blowouts. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 19(2): 113–142.
3. Davidson, F.D., and T.R. Hughes. 2022. Grassroots leadership models: a conceptual history of thought and practice. In The Palgrave handbook of educational leadership and management discourse, ed. F.W. English, 331–346. Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan.
4. Engwall, L., and M. Kipping. 2013. ‘The internationalization of international management education and its limitations. In The Routledge companion to international management education, ed. D. Tsang, H.H. Kazeroony, and G. Ellis, 319–343. London: Routledge.
5. Goldfien, A.C., and N.N. Badway. 2015. Tempered radicals: Faculty leadership in interdisciplinary curricular change authors. Community College Journal of Research and Practice 39(4): 314–323.