Abstract
AbstractThis short article offers a practical introduction to archival research for political scientists working on European politics. Archival documents are increasingly recognized as a relevant data source for process tracing analyses in small-N or mixed methods studies. Previously classified archival documents are exceptionally trustworthy due to their original confidentiality. Their rich and detailed content facilitates the understanding of causal mechanisms. Still, the hurdles for working with archival sources are high for political scientists. Lack of experience, no special training in handling historic documents, and a shortage of textbooks meeting their demands are a few of the problems political scientists planning archival research face. In the article, I highlight the opportunities of archival research and demonstrate how challenges can be overcome. I emphasize that the archival field trip should only be planned once researchers have gained substantive context knowledge. In their preparation, researchers should use all the resources archives offer and develop measurable expectations from theories.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference43 articles.
1. Art, D. 2016. Archivists and Adventurers: Research Strategies for Authoritarian Regimes of the Past and Present*. Social Science Quarterly 97 (4): 974–990.
2. Bastian, J.A., J.A. Aarons, and S.H. Griffin, eds. 2018. Decolonizing the Caribbean Record: An Archives Reader. Sacramento, California: Library Juice Press.
3. Beach, D., and R.B. Pedersen. 2013. Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4. Bennett, A., and J.T. Checkel. 2015. Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, ed. A. Bennett and J.T. Checkel, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Berry, J.M. 2002. Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing. PS Political Science & Politics. 35 (4): 679–682.