Finding the needle in the haystack: archival research in European political science

Author:

Klein Alexander

Abstract

AbstractThis short article offers a practical introduction to archival research for political scientists working on European politics. Archival documents are increasingly recognized as a relevant data source for process tracing analyses in small-N or mixed methods studies. Previously classified archival documents are exceptionally trustworthy due to their original confidentiality. Their rich and detailed content facilitates the understanding of causal mechanisms. Still, the hurdles for working with archival sources are high for political scientists. Lack of experience, no special training in handling historic documents, and a shortage of textbooks meeting their demands are a few of the problems political scientists planning archival research face. In the article, I highlight the opportunities of archival research and demonstrate how challenges can be overcome. I emphasize that the archival field trip should only be planned once researchers have gained substantive context knowledge. In their preparation, researchers should use all the resources archives offer and develop measurable expectations from theories.

Funder

Universität Konstanz

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. Art, D. 2016. Archivists and Adventurers: Research Strategies for Authoritarian Regimes of the Past and Present*. Social Science Quarterly 97 (4): 974–990.

2. Bastian, J.A., J.A. Aarons, and S.H. Griffin, eds. 2018. Decolonizing the Caribbean Record: An Archives Reader. Sacramento, California: Library Juice Press.

3. Beach, D., and R.B. Pedersen. 2013. Process-tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

4. Bennett, A., and J.T. Checkel. 2015. Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, ed. A. Bennett and J.T. Checkel, 3–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5. Berry, J.M. 2002. Validity and Reliability Issues in Elite Interviewing. PS Political Science & Politics. 35 (4): 679–682.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3