Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference69 articles.
1. Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A.E. Clarke. 2009. Anticipation: technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28: 246–265.
2. Almeling, R. 2007. Selling genes, selling gender: egg agencies, sperm banks, and the medical market in genetic material. American Sociological Review 72 (3): 319–340.
3. Almeling, R. 2021. Contesting new markets for bodily knowledge: when and how experts draw the line. In The Oxford handbook of the sociology of body and embodiment, ed. N. Boero and K. Mason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. ASRM (Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine). 2018. Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 110 (6): 1022–1028.
5. Avraham, S., R. Machtinger, T. Cahan, A. Sokolov, C. Racowsky, and D.S. Seidman. 2014. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics? Fertility and Sterility 101 (1): 222–226.