Device activism and material participation in healthcare: retracing forms of engagement in the #WeAreNotWaiting movement for open-source closed-loop systems in type 1 diabetes self-care

Author:

Jansky BiancaORCID,Langstrup Henriette

Abstract

AbstractThe #WeAreNotWaiting movement is a global digital health phenomenon in which people with diabetes, mainly type 1 diabetes (T1D), engage in the development and usage of open-source closed-loop technology for the improvement of their “chronic living” (Wahlberg et al. 2021). The characteristics of a digitally enabled and technologically engaged global activist patient collective feed into existing narratives of user-led and open-source innovation. They also call for more exploration of what it actually means to be locally involved in this kind of technologically mediated and global form of patient engagement. Building on empirical research conducted in the German healthcare context, we explore the different forms of material participation encountered among a group of people with T1D (who describe themselves as loopers), who are engaged in the development and usage of this open-source technology. Introducing the concept of device activism, we retrace three different device-centered narratives that show how a globally shared concern and political participation through technology use varies with local practices. Hereby we stress that the engagement in the #WeAreNotWaiting movement is both shaped by and is shaping the matters of concerns: devices in, on, and with bodies.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Universität Augsburg

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference106 articles.

1. Akrich, M., M. Leane, C. Roberts, and J. Nunes. 2012. Childbirth activism as evidence-based activism. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00702075/document. Accessed 01 December 2021.

2. Beck, U. 2007. The cosmopolitan condition: Why methodological nationalism fails. Theory, Culture & Society 24 (7–8): 286–290.

3. Bellander, T., and M. Landqvist. 2018. Becoming the expert constructing health knowledge in epistemic communities online. Information, Communication & Society 23: 1–16.

4. BertelsmannStiftung. 2019. #SmartHealthSystems. International comparison of digital strategies.

5. Borkman, T. 1976. Experiential knowledge: A new concept for the analysis of self-help groups. The Social Service Review 50 (3): 445–456.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3