Abstract
AbstractThe article brings together two disparate and so far largely disconnected bodies of research: the critical analysis of cryopreservation technologies and the debate on modes of anticipation. It starts with a short review of the state of the research on the concept of cryopolitics. In the next part I will suggest two revisions. I will problematize the idea of latent life and the focus on potentialities that have been central to the research on cryopolitics so far, proposing to shift the analytic frame to suspended life on the one hand and to modes of anticipation on the other. I argue that cryopreservation practices are part of contemporary technologies of anticipation. They are linked to a politics of suspension by mobilizing a liminal biological state in which frozen organisms or biological material are neither fully alive nor ultimately dead. This seeks to avert and/or enable distinctive futures by extending temporal horizons and keeping vital processes in limbo.
Funder
European Research Council
Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference117 articles.
1. Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A.E. Clarke. 2009. Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28: 246–265.
2. Alvial-Palavicino, C. 2015. The future as practice: A framework to understand anticipation in science and technology Tecnoscienza. Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies 6 (2): 135–177.
3. Anderson, B. 2010. Preemption, precaution, preparedness: Anticipatory action and future geographies. Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–798.
4. Anderson, B., K. Grove, L. Rickards, and M. Kearnes. 2020. Slow emergencies: Temporality and the racialized biopolitics of emergency governance. Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 621–639.
5. Anderson, W. 2015. The frozen archive, or defrosting Derrida. Journal of Cultural Economy 8 (3): 379–387.