Abstract
AbstractWith the highest number of students in private higher education in the world, China is updating the governance system for this sector. This process involves independent colleges, which were founded by and remain associated with public universities, but which are privately funded. As one of the strategies to improve the development of independent colleges, in 2008 the Ministry of Education asked these colleges to separate from their parent public universities. However, by the end of 2020, over half of the 2008 colleges had still not separated but, over the next year, the outstanding figure suddenly dropped by one-third. This paper analyses the factors affecting the separation from the viewpoints of different stakeholders. Private funders have an interest in making use of the parent universities’ resources and controlling and gaining financial returns from the colleges; for the parent universities, the management fees paid by the colleges are an important priority, while, for local government, more and better higher education places with less public finance is a key goal. Currently, there are few studies in the English language literature on independent colleges. By disseminating experiences of higher education reform in China, our findings could have important implications for government policymakers and for senior and practicing managers in universities.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Altbach PG (1999) Private Prometheus: private higher education and development in the 21st century. Greenwood Press.
2. Altbach PG (2016) Global perspectives on higher education. Johns Hopkins University Press.
3. Amaral A, Magalhaes A (2002) The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In: Amaral A, Jones GA, Karseth B (Eds.) Governing higher education: national perspectives on institutional governance. Springer, Netherlands, pp. 1–21
4. Ball SJ (2012) Global Education Inc: new policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. Routledge.
5. Bjarnason S, Cheng K-M, Fielden J, Lemaitre M-J, Levy D, Varghese, N. (2009) A new dynamic: private higher education. A Report Prepared for the UNESCO 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000183174
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献