Abstract
AbstractAs global economies strive for post-COVID recovery, stock market reactions to reopening announcements have become crucial indicators. Though previous research has extensively focused on COVID’s detrimental impact on stock markets, the effects of reopening remain underexplored. This study provides the first causal analysis of the effect of easing restrictions on Chinese firms’ stock prices following the end of China’s three-year Zero-COVID policy. Utilizing regression-discontinuity design, we find that most relaxed measures had minimal or negative impact. However, stock prices jumped 1.4% immediately after the full reopening announcement on December 26, 2022. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we also note a 1.6% increase in the stock prices of Mainland China firms relative to firms in other districts on the Hong Kong stock market two months post-reopening. Our findings offer key insights for policymakers and contribute significantly to academic discourse on the causal relationship between reopening policies and stock market performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Austermann F, Shen W, Slim A (2020) Governmental responses to COVID-19 and its economic impact: a brief Euro-Asian comparison. Asia Eur J 18(2):211–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-020-00577-0
2. Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis SJ, Terry S (2020) COVID-induced economic uncertainty. National Bureacheu of Economic Research. Report No. w26983. https://doi.org/10.3386/w26983
3. Bai C, Duan Y, Fan X, Tang S (2023) Financial Market Sentiment and Stock Return during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Finance Research Letters, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103709
4. Bella-Elliott D, Cullen Z, Glaeser E, Luca M, Stanton C (2021) Business Reopening during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Harvard Business School Entrepreneurial Management Working Paper: 20–132. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3634162. Accessed 15 July 2022
5. Caggiano G, Castelnuovo E, Kima R (2020) The global effects of Covid-19-induced uncertainty. Econ Lett 194:109392