Mobilization of expert knowledge and advice for the management of the Covid-19 emergency in Italy in 2020

Author:

Camporesi SilviaORCID,Angeli FedericaORCID,Fabbro Giorgia Dal

Abstract

AbstractThis qualitative case study is part of the international research project ESCaPE (Evaluating Scientific Advice in a Pandemic Emergency) and aims at understanding how expert advice has been sought, produced and utilized in the management of the Covid-19 emergency in Italy in 2020. Italy was the first country after China having to face the devastating effects of the Covid-19 soon to be pandemic. The state of national emergency was declared on January 31st, 2020, and the Italian Government sought expert advice as an important resource in the management of the pandemic. The Covid-19 crisis in Italy witnessed the emergence of different expert advisory groups: some envisaged by the law; some instituted ad hoc and tasked to deal with specific aspects of the emergency; and others that were already in place before the pandemic but that came to play a crucial role during the unfolding of the outbreak. This case study relies on a mix of both primary (stakeholder interviews) and secondary data collection (official documents and communications by expert advisory bodies, ministerial decrees, and policy documents). Our research shows three main findings: (a) the near-complete overlap of technical advice and political response in the first phase of the pandemic in Spring 2020, with a key policy role played by the advice provided by the Technical and Scientific Committee (CTS); (b) a predominance of epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists over social scientists in the mobilisation of experts for the management of the crisis in Italy; (c) a shift in containment policies from an emergency-based, very strict, national lockdown in the spring of 2020, to proactive risk-informed colour-coded regional restrictions in the fall and winter of 2020. Our case study ends at the end of 2020 and provides an overview and encompassing representation of the mobilization of experts, and of selected types of evidence, to manage the unprecedented health emergency, in year 1 of the Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. Our findings suggest that expert politics can lead to the confirmation of knowledge hierarchies that privilege hard sciences, and corroborate prior literature indicating that economic and social expertize has not been well integrated into public health expert advice, constituting a major challenge for policymaking during a health emergency.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference54 articles.

1. ADN Kronos August 7th, 2020, CTS: ‘Minutes confidential, not classified, to avoid panic’ (CTS: ‘Verbali non segreti ma riservati per non creare panico’) https://www.adnkronos.com/cts-verbali-non-segreti-ma-riservati-per-non-creare-panico_1BmmRbsVWzSMl1EddHvXLB. (Accessed: Jan 23rd, 2022)

2. Agenzia Italia (2020) Sono più scienziato io di tanti altri, anche in Cts, dice Zangrillo https://www.agi.it/cronaca/news/2020-06-01/cosa-pensano-virologi-virus-morto-zangrillo-8784242/. (Accessed: Jan 23rd, 2022)

3. Angeli F, Camporesi S, Del Fabbro G (2021) The Covid-19 wicked problem in public health ethics: conflicting evidence, or incommensurable values? Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8(1):1–8

4. Angeli F, Raab J, Oerlemans L (2020) Adaptive responses to performance gaps in project networks. In: Braun T, Lampel J (eds). Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Emerald Publishing Limited, vol. 67, pp. 153–178

5. ANSA (2020a) Coronavirus: un contagiato in Lombardia. (Coronavirus: first infected case in Lombardy). February 21st, 2020) https://www.ansa.it/sito/notizie/cronaca/2020/02/21/coronavirus-un-contagiato-in-lombardia_dda62491-4ae1-40af-9cd4-e7dc8402b493.html. (Accessed, Jan 23, 2022)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3