A bibliometric analysis of the use of the Gamification Octalysis Framework in training: evidence from Web of Science

Author:

Mohanty Sattwik,Christopher B PrabuORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe Octalysis framework, which systematically organizes gamified elements in non-game settings, such as training, has become one of the most famous persuasive tools for changing user behaviour. The field of Gamification Octalysis Framework research is expanding rapidly, moving beyond elementary questions like “what” and “why” to more complex ones like “how” and “when”. However, there remain empirical and theoretical challenges such as demonstrating the effectiveness of the Gamification Octalysis Framework and codifying the principles underpinning effective gamification design. This paper uses bibliometric analysis and scientific mapping to characterize the structure and development of the academic field of the Gamification Octalysis Framework, with the help of intellectual, conceptual, and social network structures of the framework. Our findings provide insight into the field’s research frontiers and intellectual structures, the interconnections between articles, authors, and keywords, the current collaborative networks, the hottest themes, and the most cited authors, publications, and sources, for instance, that in recent years, the Gamification Octalysis Framework has attracted significant research attention in the training field. Interestingly, 66.6% of cutting-edge research is done in the social sciences, as compared to science and technology. Researchers, academicians and professionals should be made aware of Octalysis framework gamified method because it has been shown to increase user engagement and motivation outside of social sciences game setting. We recommend that countries outside Europe integrate the Gamification Octalysis Framework in training into their learning programs and launch corresponding research centres and journals.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference33 articles.

1. Baptista G, Oliveira T (2019) Gamification and serious games: A literature meta-analysis and integrative model. Computers Human Behav 92:306–315

2. Bhatt D (2020) (PDF) Training and Development in Work Organizations, ResearchGate, 4 April, available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341111235_Training_and_Development_in_Work_Organizations

3. Blume BD, Ford JK, Baldwin TT, Huang JL (2009) Transfer of training: A meta-analytic review. J Manag 36(4):1065–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352880

4. Burke B (2012) Gamification 2020: What is the future of Gamification? Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/2226015

5. Cheng C, Ebrahimi OV (2023) A meta-analytic review of gamified interventions in Mental Health Enhancement. Comput Hum Behav 141:107621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107621

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3