Cultivating inclusivity in introductory undergraduate STEM course syllabi

Author:

Bernardi FrancescaORCID,Brown CrystalORCID,Davis Lindsay,Ephraim Michelle,Moody Rebecca,Trubko Raisa

Abstract

AbstractSyllabi are widely used at higher education institutions in the United States to present students with course-related information before or at the beginning of a new class. The timing and versatility of these documents allows instructors to set the tone of a course with (or without) an eye towards inclusivity. This can be important for all students but affects, in particular, students from marginalized groups as they navigate STEM courses. We report a study about inclusive practices in course syllabi at a STEM institution by addressing whether they: (a) list instructors’ pronouns, (b) utilize readings and materials authored by women and gender minority scholars, and (c) contain inclusivity statements. We report and compare perspectives on these three aspects from two datasets: 163 syllabi analyzed based on a rubric that we developed and results from an undergraduate student survey, both from Worcester Polytechnic Institute. The two complementary datasets provide a way to benchmark whether there is a link between student and faculty perceptions of syllabi use and desired content. We find sharp differences between students’ expectations and actual syllabi content for all three of our topics of interest with students wanting inclusive practices at the forefront of course development regardless of subject and faculty lagging behind. We provide suggestions on how to incorporate inclusive practices in syllabi design and propose further questions to explore.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference49 articles.

1. American Council on Education (2023). Carnegie Classifications to Make Major Changes in How Colleges and Universities are Grouped and Recognized, Set Clear Threshold for Highest Level of Research. Carnegie Classifications of Institutions of Higher Education. https://www.acenet.edu/News-Room/Pages/Carnegie-Classifications-to-Make-Major-Changes.aspx#:~:text=In%20the%202025%20Carnegie%20Classifications,spending%20and%2070%20research%20doctorates. Accessed April 4, 2024

2. American Council on Education (2024). Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. https://carnegieclassifications.acenet.edu/institution/worcester-polytechnic-institute/ Accessed March 25, 2024

3. Ashford, SN, Wilson, JA, King, NS, Nyachae, TM (2017). STEM SISTA spaces: creating counterspaces for black girls and women. In TS Ransaw & R Majors (Eds.). Emerging issues and trends in education (3-47). Michigan State University Press. https://doi.org/10.14321/j.ctt1qd8zjk.6

4. Calabrase Barton A, Tan E (2019) Designing for rightful presence in STEM: the role of making present practices. J. Learn. Sci. 28(4/5):616–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1591411

5. Caldwell, M, Frame, O (2016). Let’s get real: exploring race, class, and gender identities in the classroom (1st ed.) Routledge

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3