Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19

Author:

Hyland-Wood BernadetteORCID,Gardner John,Leask JulieORCID,Ecker Ullrich K. H.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractSeveral countries have successfully reduced their COVID-19 infection rate early, while others have been overwhelmed. The reasons for the differences are complex, but response efficacy has in part depended on the speed and scale of governmental intervention and how communities have received, perceived, and acted on the information provided by governments and other agencies. While there is no ‘one size fits all’ communications strategy to deliver information during a prolonged crisis, in this article, we draw on key findings from scholarship in multiple social science disciplines to highlight some fundamental characteristics of effective governmental crisis communication. We then present ten recommendations for effective communication strategies to engender maximum support and participation. We argue that an effective communication strategy is a two-way process that involves clear messages, delivered via appropriate platforms, tailored for diverse audiences, and shared by trusted people. Ultimately, the long-term success depends on developing and maintaining public trust. We outline how government policymakers can engender widespread public support and participation through increased and ongoing community engagement. We argue that a diversity of community groups must be included in engagement activities. We also highlight the implications of emerging digital technologies in communication and engagement activities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference136 articles.

1. Adler RP, Goggin J (2005) What do we mean by “civic engagement”? J Transform Educ 3(3):236–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344605276792

2. Agley J (2020) Assessing changes in US public trust in science amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health 183:122–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.004

3. Alford J, Head BW (2017) Wicked and less wicked problems: a typology and a contingency framework. Policy Soc 36(3):397–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1361634

4. Allen J, Gluckman P, Bardsley A, Sridhar H (2020) New Zealand’s place in the world: the implications of COVID-19 (The Future Is Now). University of Auckland, p. 18

5. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care and Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Exploring healthcare variation in Australia: analyses resulting from an OECD study. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/australias-health/health-literacy

Cited by 283 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3