Barriers and facilitators of translating health research findings into policy in sub-Saharan Africa: A Scoping Review

Author:

Damba Florence UpenyuORCID,Mtshali Ntombifikile Gloria,Chimbari Moses John

Abstract

AbstractDespite efforts made by sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries to promote evidence-informed health policymaking, translating research evidence into policy remains a very challenging task fraught with many barriers. However, to achieve the goal of making more evidence-informed decisions to improve health, it is critical to overcome the barriers to the translation of research into policy. This paper provides an overview of the barriers and facilitators of translating research into policy in SSA countries to understand why research findings are sometimes not translated into policy and makes suggestions for improving the situation. Arksey and O’Malley’s five-step methodological framework guided the scoping review process. Primary research literature published in English between January 2010 and March 2021 was systematically searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science and EBSCO host search engines. We focused on articles that reported on the barriers to and facilitators of translating research findings into policy. Two hundred and twenty-three articles were identified but 162 articles met the eligibility criteria. Of those that met the eligibility criteria, 73 were excluded after reading the title and abstract. After title and abstract screening, a further 70 articles were excluded thus remaining with only 19 articles from 16 SSA countries that were given a full review through data extraction and thematic analysis. The most common barriers identified were limited capacity by policymakers to use evidence, inaccessibility of research evidence, lack of high-quality usable evidence and use of policy briefs alone. Although translation of research findings into policy is fraught with a multitude of barriers, there are means to overcome them such as the availability of research results, strengthened capacity for evidence use, the establishment of a department of research within the Ministry of Health, appropriate packaging of research results, use of policy briefs, stakeholder feedback meetings and annual research dissemination conferences where policy briefs are discussed and distributed. Where funding is limited research should be policy driven instead of open-ended to avoid wasting resources. It is imperative to have a comprehensive approach to reduce barriers whilst enhancing facilitators that may improve the translation of research findings into policy.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3