Abstract
AbstractWhen schools and universities across the world transitioned online due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Ed+gineering, a National Science Foundation (NSF) project that partners engineering and education undergraduates to design and deliver engineering lessons to elementary students, also had to shift its hands-on lessons to a virtual format. Through the lens of social cognitive theory (SCT), this study investigates engineering and education students’ experiences during the shift to online instruction to understand how they perceived its influence on their learning. As a result of modifying their lessons for online delivery, students reported learning professional skills, including skills for teaching online and educational technology skills, as well as Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) content. Some also lamented missed learning opportunities, like practice presenting face-to-face. Students’ affective responses were often associated with preparing and delivering their lessons. SCT sheds light on how the mid-semester change in their environment, caused by the shift in designing and teaching from face-to-face to online, affected the undergraduate engineering and education students’ personal experiences and affect. Overall, the transition to fully online was effective for students’ perceived learning and teaching of engineering. Though students experienced many challenges developing multimedia content for delivering hands-on lessons online, they reported learning new skills and knowledge and expressed positive affective responses. From the gains reported by undergraduates, we believe that this cross-disciplinary virtual team assignment was a successful strategy for helping undergraduates build competencies in virtual skills. We posit that similar assignment structures and opportunities post-pandemic will also continue to prepare future students for the post-pandemic workplace.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference63 articles.
1. Archambault L, Kennedy K, DeBruler K, Shelton C, Dalal M, McAllister L, Huyett S (2016) Examining teacher education programs and field experiences in k-12 online learning environments. Michigan Virtual University, Lansing, MI. http://media.mivu.org/institute/pdf/examinete2016.pdf
2. Asgari S, Trajkovic J, Rahmani M, Zhang W, Lo RC, Sciortino A (2021) An observational study of engineering online education during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE 16(4):e0250041. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250041
3. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
4. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, N.J
5. Barbour MK, Fox RA, Buchanan NK (2017) K–12 Online learning and school choice: growth and expansion in the absence of evidence. The Wiley handbook of school choice. Wiley Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, pp. 421–440