How deep is your trust? A comparative user requirements’ analysis of automation in medical and mobility technologies

Author:

Hick SophiaORCID,Biermann Hannah,Ziefle Martina

Abstract

AbstractIn a changing world full of innovative technologies, trust and trust requirements are increasingly important for designing user-centred systems and ensuring their long-term implementation. In this study, we explored and compared the requirements of future users to build trust in the two contexts of medical and mobility technology by considering Ambient Assisted Living technologies (AAL) and Shared Autonomous Vehicles (SAV). We conducted an online survey study with N = 143 participants. The results show significant differences in the evaluation of individual trust requirements in the two contexts about data sharing, data privacy and security as well as customization. Using a cluster analysis, we identified distinct user groups and trust personalities in both contexts (medicine and mobility). The clusters differ in terms of innovation openness and risk readiness, initial trust, and presence of chronic illness. Correlation analyses revealed significant relationships between people’s initial perceived trust in technology in the two contexts and their assessment of trust requirements, as well as their behavioural intentions to use SAV or AAL systems. Our findings indicate that trust requirements are context-specific and influenced by individual characteristics. This knowledge can be used to inform developers and distributors of technologies to design, build, and manage systems that meet the needs of future users.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference89 articles.

1. Arning K, & Ziefle M (2015) “Get that camera out of my house!” Conjoint measurement of preferences for video-based healthcare monitoring systems in private and public places. In Inclusive Smart Cities and e-Health: 13th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, ICOST 2015, Geneva, Switzerland, June 10-12, 2015, Proceedings 13 (pp. 152-164). Springer International Publishing

2. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

3. Alonso-González MJ, Hoogendoorn-Lanser S, van Oort N, Cats O, Hoogendoorn S (2020) Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS)–A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract 132:378–401

4. AlQudah AA, Salloum SA, Shaalan K (2021) The role of technology acceptance in healthcare to mitigate COVID-19 outbreak. Emerg Technol Era COVID-19 Pandemic 348:223–244

5. Barr HM (2023) Differences in Effectiveness of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation-Based Incentives in Promoting Use, Acceptance, and Adoption of Automated Systems. Dissertation, University of Alabama

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3