Abstract
AbstractPrevious research had extensively studied the consequences of dispositional malicious and benign envy, while relatively few studies examined its determinants. Although one’s worldviews have been proposed to shape the experience of malicious and benign envy, empirical studies directly investigating this notion are scarce. To address this gap, we adopted a person-centered approach to identify different individual profiles that underlie five generalized beliefs about the world, operationalized as five social axiom dimensions. We then examined how these profiles were associated with dispositional malicious and benign envy among both adolescents and working adults (N = 1248). As suggested by latent profile analysis, a 3-profile solution provided the best fit to the data in both groups. Two latent profiles (skeptical-pessimistic and hopeful-optimistic profiles) were similar across groups, while two distinct profiles (flexible and reserved profiles) were identified in adolescents and adults respectively. A series of comparisons indicated that people with different profiles experienced malicious and benign envy differently. In general, dispositional malicious envy was stronger among those in the skeptical-pessimistic profile, while dispositional benign envy was stronger among those in the hopeful-optimistic profile. Overall, our findings facilitate discussions on the similarities and differences in worldview profiles and experiences of envy across developmental groups.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference83 articles.
1. Alexandra V (2019) The role of social worldviews and self-control in moral disengagement. Personal Individ Diff 143:74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.012
2. Arnett JJ (2000) Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers. Addict Behav 25(4):625–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4603(99)00072-6
3. Bauer, DJ, & Shanahan, MJ (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255–283). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
4. Baumel A, Berant E (2015) The role of attachment styles in malicious envy. J Res Personal 55:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.11.001
5. Benjamin DJ, Berger JO, Johannesson M, Nosek BA, Wagenmakers EJ, Berk R, Bollen KA, Brembs B, Brown L, Camerer C, Cesarini D, Chambers CD, Clyde M, Cook TD, De Boeck P, Dienes Z, Dreber A, Easwaran K, Efferson C, Johnson VE (2018) Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav 2(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z