Abstract
AbstractGrowth of science is a prevalent issue in science of science studies. In recent years, two new bibliographic databases have been introduced, which can be used to study growth processes in science from centuries back: Dimensions from Digital Science and Microsoft Academic. In this study, we used publication data from these new databases and added publication data from two established databases (Web of Science from Clarivate Analytics and Scopus from Elsevier) to investigate scientific growth processes from the beginning of the modern science system until today. We estimated regression models that included simultaneously the publication counts from the four databases. The results of the unrestricted growth of science calculations show that the overall growth rate amounts to 4.10% with a doubling time of 17.3 years. As the comparison of various segmented regression models in the current study revealed, models with four or five segments fit the publication data best. We demonstrated that these segments with different growth rates can be interpreted very well, since they are related to either phases of economic (e.g., industrialization) and/or political developments (e.g., Second World War). In this study, we additionally analyzed scientific growth in two broad fields (Physical and Technical Sciences as well as Life Sciences) and the relationship of scientific and economic growth in UK. The comparison between the two fields revealed only slight differences. The comparison of the British economic and scientific growth rates showed that the economic growth rate is slightly lower than the scientific growth rate.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference55 articles.
1. Baas J, Schotten M, Plume A, Côté G, Karimi R (2020) Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
2. Birkle C, Pendlebury DA, Schnell J, Adams J (2020) Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quan Sci Stud 1(1):363–376. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00018
3. Bornmann L, Mutz R (2015) Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 66(11):2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329
4. Capie F, Wood G (1997) Great depression of 1873–1896. In: Glasner D, Cooley TF (Eds.) Business cycles and depressions: an encyclopedia. Garland Publishing, New York, NY, pp. 148–149
5. Clarivate (2020) Book Citation Index-Clarivate Analytics. Retrieved 24 September 2020, from http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/bookcitationindex/
Cited by
117 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献