Abstract
AbstractThis qualitative analysis of the Social Studies curriculum for Grades 3 to 6 for the province of Ontario, Canada examines binary framing in curriculum as a mechanism of cognitive imperialism that compartmentalizes Indigenous knowledge(s). The following binaries are discussed: Positive/Negative; Conflict/Cooperation; and Us/Them in terms of the ways that they compartmentalize Indigenous knowledge(s) and reinforce cognitive imperialism. Themes for further research are noted including presumptions of neutrality that divorce power analysis from perspective-taking, the prioritizing of peaceful relations over redressing power imbalances and adding Indigenous-themed content to the curriculum is not enough. Recommendations for curriculum reform are indicated and decolonial justice education (DJE) is conceptualized for actionable steps towards answering the Calls to Action in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015a, 2015b, 2015c).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference72 articles.
1. Ahenakew CR (2017) Mapping and complicating conversations about Indigenous education. Diaspora Indig Minor Educ 11(2):80–91
2. Alexander JC (2013) The dark side of modernity. Polity Press
3. Angeli C, Voogt J, Fluck A, Webb M, Cox M, Malyn-Smith J, Zagami J (2016) A K-6 computational thinking curriculum framework: implications for teacher knowledge. Educ Technol Soc 19(3):47–57. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A461608113/CIC?u=utoronto_main&sid=CIC&xid=b9ea151a
4. Battiste M (2013) Decolonizing education: nourishing the learning spirit. Purich Publishing
5. Battiste M (2016) Cognitive imperialism. In: Peters M (ed) Encyclopedia of educational philosophy and theory. Springer. pp. 1–6