Mobilization of science advice by the Canadian federal government to support the COVID-19 pandemic response

Author:

Bhatia DominikaORCID,Allin Sara,Di Ruggiero Erica

Abstract

AbstractThe procurement and provision of expert-driven, evidence-informed, and independent science advice is integral to timely decision-making during public health emergencies. The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has underscored the need for sound evidence in public health policy and exposed the challenges facing government science advisory mechanisms. This paper is a jurisdictional case study describing (i) the federal science advice bodies and mechanisms for public health in Canada (i.e., the federal science advice “ecosystem”); and (ii) how these bodies and mechanisms have mobilized and evolved to procure expertise and evidence to inform decisions during the first two years of the COVID-19 pandemic. We reviewed publicly accessible Government of Canada documents, technical reports, and peer-reviewed articles available up to December 2021. Canada’s federal landscape of science advisory bodies for public health within the Health Portfolio was largely shaped by Canada’s experiences with the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome and 2009 H1N1 outbreaks. In parallel, Canada has a designated science advisory apparatus that has seen frequent reforms since the early 2000s, with the current Office of the Chief Science Advisor created within the Science Portfolio in 2018. The COVID-19 pandemic has further complicated Canada’s science advice ecosystem, with involvement from departments, expert advisory groups, and partnerships within both the federal Health and Science Portfolios. Although the engagement of federal departments outside the health sector is promising, the COVID-19 experience in Canada supports the need to institutionalize science advisory bodies for public health to improve pandemic preparedness and ensure rapid mobilization of well-coordinated and independent advice in future emergencies. This review also identified pressing areas for further inquiry to strengthen science advice for public health in Canada, including to assess the independence of science advisory actors and the interaction between federal and subnational authorities.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference169 articles.

1. Allen K, Buklijas T, Chen A, Simon-Kumar N, Cowen L, Wilsdon J, Gluckman P (2020) Tracking global evidence-to-policy pathways in the coronavirus crisis: a preliminary report. International Network for Government Science Advice. https://www.ingsa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/INGSA-Evidence-to-Policy-Tracker_Report-1_FINAL_17Sept.pdf

2. Allin S, Fitzpatrick T, Marchildon GP, Quesnel-Vallée A (2021) The federal government and Canada’s COVID-19 responses: from ‘we’re ready, we’re prepared’ to ‘fires are burning.’ Health Econ Policy Law, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744133121000220

3. Attaran A, Hardcastle L (2020, November 13). Politicians are failing. Canada’s chief medical officers need to step in. Maclean’s. https://www.macleans.ca/opinion/politicians-are-failing-canadas-chief-medical-officers-need-to-step-in/

4. Bana R, Cram J, Hu J, Pawa J, Waddell K (2018). Public Health Systems in Canada. Public Health Physicians of Canada. https://www.phpc-mspc.ca/resources/Documents/PHSC-24Jul20.pdf

5. BC COVID-19 Modelling Group (2022) About. BC COVID-19 Modelling Group. https://bccovid-19group.ca/

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3