Using the interest theory of rights and Hohfeldian taxonomy to address a gap in machine learning methods for legal document analysis

Author:

Izzidien AhmedORCID

Abstract

AbstractRights and duties are essential features of legal documents. Machine learning algorithms have been increasingly applied to extract information from such texts. Currently, their main focus is on named entity recognition, sentiment analysis, and the classification of court cases to predict court outcome. In this paper it is argued that until the essential features of such texts are captured, their analysis can remain bottle-necked by the very technology being used to assess them. As such, the use of legal theory to identify the most pertinent dimensions of such texts is proposed. Specifically, the interest theory of rights, and the first-order Hohfeldian taxonomy of legal relations. These principal legal dimensions allow for a stratified representation of knowledge, making them ideal for the abstractions needed for machine learning. This study considers how such dimensions may be identified. To do so it implements a novel heuristic based in philosophy coupled with language models. Hohfeldian relations of ‘rights-duties’ vs. ‘privileges-no-rights’ are determined to be identifiable. Classification of each type of relation to accuracies of 92.5% is found using Sentence Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers. Testing is carried out on religious discrimination policy texts in the United Kingdom.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference135 articles.

1. Ahn N (2017) Comparing NLP methods for identifying policy decisions in government documents. Poliinformatics of Lawmaking

2. Alfaro F, Ruiz Costa-Jussà M, Rodríguez Fonollosa JA (2019) BERT masked language modeling for co-reference resolution. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on gender bias in natural language processing. pp. 76–81

3. Artificiallawyer (2019) France bans judge analytics, 5 years in prison for rule breakers. Artificial Lawyer. https://www.artificiallawyer.com/2019/06/04/france-bans-judge-analytics-5-years-in-prison-for-rule-breakers/

4. Barnett J, Treleaven P (2018) Algorithmic dispute resolution—the automation of professional dispute resolution using AI and blockchain technologies. Comput J 61(3):399–408

5. Beckh K, Müller S, Jakobs M, Toborek V, Tan H, Fischer R, Welke P, Houben S, von Rueden L (2021) Explainable machine learning with prior knowledge: an overview. https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.10172

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A network model of legal relations;Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences;2024-02-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3