AV futures or futures with AVs? Bridging sociotechnical imaginaries and a multi-level perspective of autonomous vehicle visualisations in praxis

Author:

Martin RobertORCID

Abstract

AbstractCurrent depictions of autonomous vehicle (AV) futures are produced primarily by automobile manufacturers that largely reflect and reinforce existing sociotechnical systems in a ‘business as usual’ model that frames this technology within a narrative of crisis and technological salvation. This article argues for a more complex analysis of AV futures in which images are understood as vessels for sociotechnical imaginaries that direct and delimit what we think is possible in the future. Through an analytical framework incorporating automobility, transitions, and imaginaries, I explore how depictions of AVs frame the technology as responding to various system pressures over time through a comparative analysis of two actors. The analysis suggests that regime actors deploy visual discursive material as a tool of regime stability or change to benefit their own agendas. The intention of the article is not to anticipate current trajectories but is a methodological exploration of how policymakers and planners can interpret AV visualisations. Therefore, the paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of these imaginaries for future transportation systems. It further suggests that policymakers and planners need to take a more active role in the development of AV futures by paying much more attention to the latent meanings behind AV visualisations and working collaboratively with those who produce them.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Psychology,General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference72 articles.

1. Adams J (1999) The Social Implications of Hypermobility. Speculations about the Social Consequences of the OECD Scenarios for Environmentally Sustainable Transport and Business-as-Usual Trend Projections. Paris

2. Albers P (2013) Visual discourse analysis. In: New Methods of Literacy Research. pp. 85–97

3. de Berker A (2017) Driverless Cars and the Attention Economy, Medium. https://becominghuman.ai/driverless-cars-and-the-attention-economy-7efd6aa6a6a0 (Accessed 24 Sep 2020)

4. Blyth P, Mladenovic MN, Nardi BA, Ekbia HR, Su NM (2016) Expanding the design horizon for self-driving vehicles. IEEE Technol Soc Magazine 35:44–49

5. Bonnefon J-F, Černy D, Danaher J, Devillier N, Johansson V, Kovacikova T, Martens M, Mladenovic M, Palade P, Reed N, Santoni de Sio F (2020) Ethics of connected and Automated Vehicles. Luxembourg https://doi.org/10.2777/966923

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3